Evidence of sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study carried out a scoping review of research on intimate partner violence to determine the extent to which studies on sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women (15–24 years) have been conducted, and how different geographical areas are represented. It also considered whether the methodologies used were sufficient to describe the risk factors, prevalence and health outcomes associated with intimate partner violence among young women.Study designScoping review.MethodsOnline databases were used to identify studies published between 2008 and 2019. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines by Arksey and O’Malley were used to select studies, and primary studies were assessed using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool, V.2011. Thematic content analysis was used to summarise the findings of the scoping review.ResultsThe majority of publications eight (61.5%) reported cross-sectional studies, while four (31.5%) were qualitative studies. One of the studies (7%) collected measured data. Overall, 13 (100%) of the publications examined factors influencing intimate partner violence.Using a customised quality assessment instrument, 12 (92.3%) of studies achieved a ‘high’-quality ranking with a score of 100%, and 7.7% of studies achieved an ‘average’ quality ranking with a score of 75%.ConclusionsWhile the quality of the studies is generally high, researches on sociocultural factors influencing intimate partner violence among young women would benefit from a careful selection of methods and reference standards, including direct measures of the violence affecting young women. Prospective cohort studies are required linking early exposure with individual, sociocultural and community factors, and detailing the abuse experienced from childhood, adolescence and youth.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018116463.Scoping protocol publicationhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1234-y

The influences of sociocultural norms on women's decision to disclose intimate partner violence: Integrative review

“…The MMAT critical appraisal tool allows for the examination of methodological and conceptual design components of qualitative, quantitative, and MM research studies (Hong et al, 2019; Maguele et al, 2020). Two authors (A. G. and C. R. S.) independently assessed the quality of each study and then jointly discussed quality appraisal results to determine whether articles should be included.…”

Prevalence and risk factors for intimate partner violence and indigenous women: A scoping review

“…An earlier study observed similar risk factors for IPV among young women, namely, discrepancy in education level between partners and low economic status; unemployment; alcohol consumption by partner; and history of violence, including child violence experienced by both partners, as well as male‐dominated social norms/rules and legal systems. However, these authors warned that, even with a diversity of factors, it is still not possible to understand the phenomenon, as there are few studies that assess the sociocultural influence on IPV (Maguele et al, 2020). Thus, this study reflects the greater complexity when assessing IPV against indigenous women, as studies with this specific population are scarce and difficult to compare from a sociocultural point of view.…”

A Comprehensive Analysis of Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Femicide: A Systematic Review

“…The mentioned guideline is a unique, efficient appraisal tool focused on the methodology criteria of different study designs simultaneously [ 50 ]. For this reason and given that this quality assessment tool has been applied to systematic reviews related to the intimate partner violence topic [ 52 , 53 , 54 ], it has been selected for the quality assessment. Two researchers assessed the quality of each study, and a third one resolved discrepancies.…”