Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/ab8918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of new 2D material: Cu2Te

Abstract: The number of two-dimensional (2D) materials has grown steadily since the discovery of graphene. Each new 2D material demonstrated unusual physical properties offering a large flexibility in their tailoring for high-tech applications. Here, we report on the formation and characterization of an uncharted 2D material: ‘Cu2Te alloy monolayer on Cu(111) surface’. We have successfully grown a 2D binary Te-Cu alloy using a straightforward approach based on chemical deposition method. Low electron energy diffraction … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
17
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results contradict the findings of others who claim that the deposition of 1 /3 ML Te leads to the formation of a Cu 2 Te-surface alloy with a √ 3 × √ 3 R30 • supercell [18][19][20] . Only one early investigation reported a 2 √ 3 × √ 3 R30 • structure for this coverage 17 .…”
contrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results contradict the findings of others who claim that the deposition of 1 /3 ML Te leads to the formation of a Cu 2 Te-surface alloy with a √ 3 × √ 3 R30 • supercell [18][19][20] . Only one early investigation reported a 2 √ 3 × √ 3 R30 • structure for this coverage 17 .…”
contrasting
confidence: 90%
“…To understand the nucleation and the formation of interfaces one needs to start with a low Te coverage Θ. For the particular case of Θ = 1 /3 ML of Te on Cu(111) attempts have been made over the years [16][17][18][19][20] but a true reliable structural analysis is still missing. Seemingly, there is an agreement on a √ 3 × √ 3 R30 • superstructure, but from our work we can infer that such a structure only occurs at much higher Te coverage or under the influence of some contaminant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these interesting dynamics, this transformation is also a potential synthetic pathway for producing flat platelets of single-crystal Cu 2 Te, which has only been synthesized in a few nanostructured form factors to date. [63][64][65][66] As mentioned previously, the details of the transformation process are specific to the high vacuum conditions used here. However, to verify the applicability of these results to other conditions, Cu-intercalated Bi 2 Te 3 platelets were heated to 650 C in a 200-Torr Ar environment as shown in Figure S4A.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also allows in situ real-time monitoring and characterization of material growth and evolution processes,s urface dynamics,a nd surface chemistry.Scanning tunneling spectroscopy can precisely reveal the electronic structures of the surface at the atomic scale.F urthermore,S TM can be combined with many other ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) techniques to provide comprehensive characterization of the sample surface.C ompared with transmission electron microscopy (another powerful technique with the capability of atomic-resolution imaging), STM experiments can be considered non-invasive and the sample preparation is relatively straightforward. However,S TM requires an atomically smooth and conductive surface and asharp metallic tip.Although STM can offer crucial insights into the fundamental understanding of materials ultimately at the atomic scale, [15] STM studies on perovskite materials are still relatively rare,p resumably because of the technical difficulty in obtaining an immaculate and atomically flat sample surface. [13a, 16] Recent findings indicate that the surface trap states in the perovskite layer can strongly influence the performance of the solar cell devices; [7b,17] however, the chemical and physical properties of atomic-scale defects and surface and interface properties are not well-understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%