2018
DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2018.1445177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of learning processes in EIA systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One study, for example, examined 30 cases of environmental impact assessment in Ontario, Canada and found four main KM functions as essential for promoting sustainability: support the acquisition and use of sustainable knowledge; communicate sustainable practices and harness community input; facilitate coordinated analysis and integrated assessment; and, reengineer regulation enforcement to simplify the process [39]. Another study showed that learning is an important factor of environmental impact assessment (EIA) in particular, due to its potential to transform individual, social, and organizational values, standards and practices, in order to support a sustainable development [40]. While there is evidence that KM has a substantial impact on sustainability and on the manner in which it can influence organizations and society, there are still gaps in existing grounded theoretical models of the link between KM and sustainability [38][39][40].…”
Section: Km Agility and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One study, for example, examined 30 cases of environmental impact assessment in Ontario, Canada and found four main KM functions as essential for promoting sustainability: support the acquisition and use of sustainable knowledge; communicate sustainable practices and harness community input; facilitate coordinated analysis and integrated assessment; and, reengineer regulation enforcement to simplify the process [39]. Another study showed that learning is an important factor of environmental impact assessment (EIA) in particular, due to its potential to transform individual, social, and organizational values, standards and practices, in order to support a sustainable development [40]. While there is evidence that KM has a substantial impact on sustainability and on the manner in which it can influence organizations and society, there are still gaps in existing grounded theoretical models of the link between KM and sustainability [38][39][40].…”
Section: Km Agility and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study showed that learning is an important factor of environmental impact assessment (EIA) in particular, due to its potential to transform individual, social, and organizational values, standards and practices, in order to support a sustainable development [40]. While there is evidence that KM has a substantial impact on sustainability and on the manner in which it can influence organizations and society, there are still gaps in existing grounded theoretical models of the link between KM and sustainability [38][39][40].…”
Section: Km Agility and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration that can lead to more effective mine closure planning was evidenced in the development of a culture of mine closure described for wider parts of the business and knowledge development, learning from past mistakes and even back-influencing the approvals process to achieve better outcomes. Learning and knowledge development delivers effectiveness by broadening acceptance and understanding with stakeholders, transforming standards and practices and improving outcomes (Sánchez & Mitchell 2017;Cruz et al 2018;Pope et al 2018;ICMM 2019).…”
Section: Comparison With Published Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Associação Brasileira de Avaliação de Impacto (ABAI) tem promovido seminários 2 e congressos 3 voltados para esta discussão, estimulando que sejam resgatadas as bases conceituais da AIA. Segundo a ABAI, dentre os aspectos-chave para a modernização do licenciamento ambiental no país estariam a necessidade de gerar evidências dos pontos fortes e fracos da prática da AIA, resgatar aspectos conceituais e avançar na eficiência do processo buscando simplificação e agilidade amparadas por princípios de boas práticas (ASSOCIAÇÃO MONTAÑO, 2012MONTAÑO, , 2017RESENDE, 2016; OLIVEIRA E AGUIAR; SÁNCHEZ, 2016;ROCHA;MONTAÑO, 2017;BORIONI;DUARTE et al, 2017;RODRIGUES, 2017;CRUZ;MONTAÑO, 2018). Apesar da melhoria da AIA ao longo do tempo, a exemplo das apontadas por Landim e e por Sánchez (2013b), ainda há muitas críticas quanto à qualidade dos estudos ambientais e à eficácia de seus procedimentos (MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL, 2004;PRADO FILHO;SOUZA, 2004;SCHERER, 2011;ALMEIDA;MONTAÑO, 2017;MONTAÑO, 2017).…”
Section: Introdução E Justificativaunclassified