2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2006.03.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for non-linear BCS resistance in SRF cavities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, to estimate its magnitude under different conditions, we can use ∆T out (B rf ) = T out − T b directly measured on the outside cavity walls by temperature mapping [32]. Given the surface magnetic field H and the average surface resistance R s = G/Q 0 from rf measurements, and the outside wall temperature T out from temperature mapping (taking into account thermometers efficiency [32] of ∼ 35%), we apply a 1D heat diffusion model with a surface heat source of P = 1/2R s H 2 , and niobium thermal conductivity κ(T ) = 0.7e 1.65T −0.1T 2 W/m·K [33] to calculate the rf surface temperature T rf . An expected increase in R BCS due to heating is then calculated and the results at T = 2 K and T = 1.66 K are shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, to estimate its magnitude under different conditions, we can use ∆T out (B rf ) = T out − T b directly measured on the outside cavity walls by temperature mapping [32]. Given the surface magnetic field H and the average surface resistance R s = G/Q 0 from rf measurements, and the outside wall temperature T out from temperature mapping (taking into account thermometers efficiency [32] of ∼ 35%), we apply a 1D heat diffusion model with a surface heat source of P = 1/2R s H 2 , and niobium thermal conductivity κ(T ) = 0.7e 1.65T −0.1T 2 W/m·K [33] to calculate the rf surface temperature T rf . An expected increase in R BCS due to heating is then calculated and the results at T = 2 K and T = 1.66 K are shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction of the mean free path by baking indicates that the surface resistance changes from clean (l > ) to dirty (l < ) limit and therefore the development of a theoretical treatment of the BCS surface resistance at low temperature (T=T c < 0:23) and high rf field (B rf =B c > 0:5) as a function of the mean free path could be very useful, as already pointed out in Ref. [4].…”
Section: Comparison Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Postpurification of the niobium cavity improves the thermal conductivity of the material, which should reduce the Q drop if it would be caused by the limited heat transfer from the rf surface to the helium bath, as proposed by the so-called thermal feedback model described in Ref. [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R s (B p ) dependence predicted by the thermal feedback model is not as strong as is often measured experimentally, particularly for cavities at gigahertz frequency for which R BCS is relatively low compared to S-band cavities [121]. The convenient availability of large Nb crystals has enabled a more precise characterization of the Kapitza resistance at the niobium/superfluid helium interface [128].…”
Section: Medium-field Q-slopementioning
confidence: 93%