2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4812665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of the microwave surface resistance of superconducting niobium on the magnitude of the rf field

Abstract: Utilizing difference in temperature dependencies we decoupled BCS and residual components of the microwave surface resistance of superconducting niobium at all rf fields up to B rf ∼ 110 mT.We reveal that the residual resistance decreases with field at B rf < ∼ 40 mT and strongly increases in chemically treated niobium at B rf > 80 mT. We find that BCS surface resistance is weakly dependent on field in the clean limit, whereas a strong and peculiar field dependence emerges after 120 • C vacuum baking.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, niobium after the surface treatments exhibits similar defect depth distribution as other metals studied, nevertheless high surface sensitivity to the positron annihilation is a new feature of this metal. This was also observed by Romanenko and Grassellino who measured the microwave surface resistivity of superconducting niobium at RF field [30]. This resistivity strongly increases in chemically treated niobium, presumably due to different roughness.…”
Section: Remarkssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Thus, niobium after the surface treatments exhibits similar defect depth distribution as other metals studied, nevertheless high surface sensitivity to the positron annihilation is a new feature of this metal. This was also observed by Romanenko and Grassellino who measured the microwave surface resistivity of superconducting niobium at RF field [30]. This resistivity strongly increases in chemically treated niobium, presumably due to different roughness.…”
Section: Remarkssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It also plays a role in a systematic improvement of Q at mid and high field, as it is clear from figure 4 and 5. The origin of the improvement in Q stems from both an improvement in residual and BCS surface resistance, as a function of field, as it will be shown from the analysis of the decomposition [6] in the two components as a function of RF field, in figure 6. Fig.4 Effect of nitrogen infusion at 120°C versus standard 120°C bake post oxidation.…”
Section: Fig3mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…All of the other cavities out of our large set prepared with different surface treatments (see Table I) exhibited very similar Q saturation behavior at low fields. The drop in Q at higher fields of > ∼ 3 MV/m is due to so-called medium and high field Q slopes [1,9]; non-equilibrium quasiparticle energy distribution driven by the rf field is another possible contributor [29].…”
Section: Time (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%