2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002990000228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for new nuclear and mitochondrial genome organizations among high-frequency somatic embryogenesis-derived plants of allotetraploid Coffea arabica L. (Rubiaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ISSR fingerprinting is a very potent tool to compare genomes for their identity. In some cases it is also possible to identify even minor somaclonal variations among the individuals (Rani et al 2000;Li and Ge, 2001). However epigenetic variation related to change in DNA structure or methylation could not be explained by ISSR markers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISSR fingerprinting is a very potent tool to compare genomes for their identity. In some cases it is also possible to identify even minor somaclonal variations among the individuals (Rani et al 2000;Li and Ge, 2001). However epigenetic variation related to change in DNA structure or methylation could not be explained by ISSR markers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISSR has several advantages, particularly in reproducibility and higher informative nature (Nagaoka and Ogihara 1997). ISSR has been successfully used to detect variations in several plants including Coffea arabica (Rani et al 2000), tea (Devarumuth et al 2002), banana (Ray et al 2006), Codonopsis lanceolate (Guo et al 2006a) and Robinia ambigura (Guo et al 2006b). …”
Section: ⎯⎯⎯⎯mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, Devarumath et al (2002) did not detect any polymorphism in plastid genome of the micropropagated plants of three tea clones. The chloroplast genome has been found to remain stable also in regenerants of Coffea arabica (Rani et al 2000) and F. vulgare (Bennici et al 2004). Only few studies have detected structural changes in the plastid genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By contrast, both genic and chromosomic mutations like inversion, deletion or translocation can be detected by molecular markers. Since mutations could occur both on nuclear DNA and on mitochondrial (mt) or chloroplast (cp) DNA (Kawata et al 1995;Rani et al 2000), various DNA markers like RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA), ISSR (inter simple sequence repeat) for nuclear genome screening (Gostimsky et al 2005), and RFLP (random fragment length polymorphism) for both nuclear and organellar genome screening (Devarumath et al 2002) are required to assess the genetic stability of somaclones. The occurrence of somaclonal variation is influenced by several factors such as explant type, culture medium, age of donor plant, number of subcultures and tissue culture system itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%