2019
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18070835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for Dissociable Linkage of Dimensions of Psychopathology to Brain Structure in Youths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
83
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
11
83
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with our hypotheses that general psychopathology (p) drives the convergence of structural alterations common across disorders, we found 1) very few associations unique to the Internalizing, Externalizing, or Thought Disorder diagnostic families and 2) that associations with the p factor highly overlapped with those for the three diagnostic families. The pervasive and transdiagnostic nature of these associations is consistent with studies revealing that most structural brain differences are not unique to categorical mental disorders but rather shared across disorders (3,4,11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with our hypotheses that general psychopathology (p) drives the convergence of structural alterations common across disorders, we found 1) very few associations unique to the Internalizing, Externalizing, or Thought Disorder diagnostic families and 2) that associations with the p factor highly overlapped with those for the three diagnostic families. The pervasive and transdiagnostic nature of these associations is consistent with studies revealing that most structural brain differences are not unique to categorical mental disorders but rather shared across disorders (3,4,11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The cohort is primarily white (93%), matching South Island demographics (12). Assessments were carried out at birth and ages 3,5,7,9,11,13,15,18,21,26,32,38, and most recently (completed April 2019) 45 years. The relevant ethics committees approved each phase of the Study and informed consent was obtained from all participants.…”
Section: Study Design and Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain structural covariance networks reflect intra-individual (Yun et al, 2016;Seidlitz et al, 2018a) or inter-individual (Alexander-Bloch et al, 2013;Kaczkurkin et al, 2019;Wannan et al, 2019) covariation in morphology of different brain areas, which may in turn point to common trajectories in brain development and maturation (Yun et al, 2015(Yun et al, , 2016Hunt et al, 2016). Such networks may focus on a range of morphological features including regional brain volume (Spreng et al, 2019), cortical thickness (Solé-Casals et al, 2019), cortical surface area (Sharda et al, 2017), and cortical white-grey contrast (Makowski et al, 2019), as well as the paired or conjoint patterns between different brain regions (Seidlitz et al, 2018b;Hoagey et al, 2019) Brain structural covariance has been estimated using Pearson's correlation coefficient (Seidlitz et al, 2018a;Solé-Casals et al, 2019;Wannan et al, 2019), partial least squares (Hoagey et al, 2019;Spreng et al, 2019), non-negative matrix factorization (Kaczkurkin et al, 2019), and inverse exponential of the difference between z-score transformed brain morphological values (Wee et al, 2013;Yun et al, 2015Yun et al, , 2016, among others. Structural covariance networks are more similar to patterns of functional connectivity than the architecture of white matter connections, suggesting that areas that co-vary in morphological characteristics also belong to the same functional network (Zielinski et al, 2010;Soriano-Mas et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies focused on clinical symptoms or cognitive function. The broader set of behavioral phenotypes in the present study allowed us to explore other dimensions of psychopathology, not constrained within the limits of clinical symptoms commonly investigated in many transdiagnostic studies (15,16,28,30,(46)(47)(48). Prior cerebellar structure studies using factor analyses suggested the presence of latent dimensions of psychopathology such as internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, and psychosis symptoms (49), as well as a general psychopathology (or p) factor (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%