“…Brain structural covariance networks reflect intra-individual (Yun et al, 2016;Seidlitz et al, 2018a) or inter-individual (Alexander-Bloch et al, 2013;Kaczkurkin et al, 2019;Wannan et al, 2019) covariation in morphology of different brain areas, which may in turn point to common trajectories in brain development and maturation (Yun et al, 2015(Yun et al, , 2016Hunt et al, 2016). Such networks may focus on a range of morphological features including regional brain volume (Spreng et al, 2019), cortical thickness (Solé-Casals et al, 2019), cortical surface area (Sharda et al, 2017), and cortical white-grey contrast (Makowski et al, 2019), as well as the paired or conjoint patterns between different brain regions (Seidlitz et al, 2018b;Hoagey et al, 2019) Brain structural covariance has been estimated using Pearson's correlation coefficient (Seidlitz et al, 2018a;Solé-Casals et al, 2019;Wannan et al, 2019), partial least squares (Hoagey et al, 2019;Spreng et al, 2019), non-negative matrix factorization (Kaczkurkin et al, 2019), and inverse exponential of the difference between z-score transformed brain morphological values (Wee et al, 2013;Yun et al, 2015Yun et al, , 2016, among others. Structural covariance networks are more similar to patterns of functional connectivity than the architecture of white matter connections, suggesting that areas that co-vary in morphological characteristics also belong to the same functional network (Zielinski et al, 2010;Soriano-Mas et al, 2013).…”