2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.08.288019
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for conformational change-induced hydrolysis of β-tubulin-GTP

Abstract: Microtubules, protein polymers of α/β-tubulin dimers, form the structural framework for many essential cellular processes including cell shape formation, intracellular transport, and segregation of chromosomes during cell division. It is known that tubulin-GTP hydrolysis is closely associated with microtubule polymerization dynamics. However, the precise roles of GTP hydrolysis in tubulin polymerization and microtubule depolymerization, and how it is initiated are still not clearly defined. We report here that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The barrier for the free heterodimer MFEP is 3.8 ± 0.5 kcal/mol higher than compacted, while the barrier for the expanded interdimer complex is 6.3 ± 0.5 kcal/mol higher than compacted. The rate difference between the compacted and free heterodimer–concerted pathways corresponds well to recent experimental measurements of GTP hydrolysis in an MT (0.16 s –1 ) versus free tubulin (0.0003 s –1 ), which translates to an energetic difference of 3.9 kcal/mol ( 17 ). Another recent study comparing wild-type MTs to E254D mutants determined a rate of 0.2 s –1 for GTP hydrolysis in an MT, corresponding to an energy difference with the free tubulin measurement of 4.00 kcal/mol ( 18 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The barrier for the free heterodimer MFEP is 3.8 ± 0.5 kcal/mol higher than compacted, while the barrier for the expanded interdimer complex is 6.3 ± 0.5 kcal/mol higher than compacted. The rate difference between the compacted and free heterodimer–concerted pathways corresponds well to recent experimental measurements of GTP hydrolysis in an MT (0.16 s –1 ) versus free tubulin (0.0003 s –1 ), which translates to an energetic difference of 3.9 kcal/mol ( 17 ). Another recent study comparing wild-type MTs to E254D mutants determined a rate of 0.2 s –1 for GTP hydrolysis in an MT, corresponding to an energy difference with the free tubulin measurement of 4.00 kcal/mol ( 18 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…GTP hydrolysis has been known to be faster in the MT lattice than the free heterodimer, with recent experiments anticipating a rate difference of 500- to 700-fold, corresponding to an energetic barrier difference of 3.9 ± 0.1 kcal/mol ( 17 , 18 ). Cryo-EM measurements and mutagenesis studies have led to the hypothesis that specific α-tubulin residues (α:E254 and α:D251) complete the β-tubulin GTPase site and catalyze hydrolysis ( 18 22 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate difference between the compacted and free heterodimer concerted pathways corresponds well to recent experimental measurements of GTP hydrolysis in a MT (0.16 s -1 ) versus free tubulin (0.0003 s -1 ), which translates to an energetic difference of 3.9 kcal/mol. 17 Another recent study comparing wildtype MTs to E254D mutants determined a rate of 0.2 s -1 for GTP hydrolysis in an MT, corresponding to an energy difference with the free tubulin measurement of 4.00 kcal/mol. 18 Comparing these experimental values gives us a kinetic barrer of 3.9 ± 0.1 kcal/mol, which is to within error excellent agreement with our compacted vs. free heterodimer concerted pathway barrier difference of 3.8 ± 0.5 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 GTP hydrolysis has been known to be faster in the MT lattice than the free heterodimer, with recent experiments anticipating a rate difference of 500 to 700 fold, corresponding to an energetic barrier difference of 3.9 ± 0.1 kcal/mol. 17,18 Cryo-EM measurements and mutagenesis studies on have led to the hypothesis that specific a-tubulin residues (a:E254 and a:D251) complete the β-tubulin GTPase site and catalyze hydrolysis. [18][19][20][21][22] Additionally, when a non-hydrolyzable GTP-mimic, GMPCPP, is used in place of GTP the MT lattice seems to be expanded relative to the GDP lattice, which supports the hypothesis that lattice compaction induced by hydrolysis incurs strain on the MT lattice, which in turn is released by catastrophe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%