“…This interpretation has been the subject of considerable debate, but does not appear currently to be widely accepted, although the notion that there may be some 'pairing' (in some senses implicit in the discussion of the missing diffracted beams above) remains. One particular objection to the specific model originally proposed is that there is strong evidence [50,51,52] that disulphides adsorb by cleavage of the S-S bond to form thiolates, rather than the opposite effect. A later NIXSW investigation of this same system, involving some of the same researchers [53], did favour S-S headgroup pairing, albeit with different local adsorption sites, one S being close to an atop site, with the second (inequivalent) S atom being offset from a hollow site yet higher above the surface, suggesting that this S atoms does not form a S-Au chemisorption bond.…”