1982
DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(82)90058-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a role of the caudate nucleus in the sequential organization of behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased responding during CS (cue)-induced reinstatement following shell inactivation is suggestive of an inhibitory influence on the activation of CS-drug or response-drug associations, possibly arising from the environmental context. A possible role for the NAcc shell region in mediating such contextual effects derives from its close anatomical ( Van den Bercken and Cools, 1982;Groenewegen et al, 1987;Selden et al, 1990;McDonald and White, 1993;Floresco et al, 2001) associations with the hippocampus, as distinct from the NAcc core region, which receives afferents predominantly from the amygdala (Groenewegen et al, 1999). Moreover, hippocampal and amygdaloid projections to the NAcc often exert competing influences on behavior in response to contextual or discrete cues, respectively (Van den Bercken and Cools, 1982;Floresco et al, 2001), consistent with the opposed effects of NAcc core and NAcc shell inactivations in this experiment.…”
Section: Persistent Responding For a Conditioned Reinforcersupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The increased responding during CS (cue)-induced reinstatement following shell inactivation is suggestive of an inhibitory influence on the activation of CS-drug or response-drug associations, possibly arising from the environmental context. A possible role for the NAcc shell region in mediating such contextual effects derives from its close anatomical ( Van den Bercken and Cools, 1982;Groenewegen et al, 1987;Selden et al, 1990;McDonald and White, 1993;Floresco et al, 2001) associations with the hippocampus, as distinct from the NAcc core region, which receives afferents predominantly from the amygdala (Groenewegen et al, 1999). Moreover, hippocampal and amygdaloid projections to the NAcc often exert competing influences on behavior in response to contextual or discrete cues, respectively (Van den Bercken and Cools, 1982;Floresco et al, 2001), consistent with the opposed effects of NAcc core and NAcc shell inactivations in this experiment.…”
Section: Persistent Responding For a Conditioned Reinforcersupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Regarding the deficits seen in the cognitive tests, table 6 clearly shows that there are significant differences between the two groups with respect to the criterion tests for "shifting aptitude" in the verbal and figural modality. First, word production tests: regarding the two alternative kinds of interpretations (see Methods, measurement of "shifting aptitude" and statistical analysis), table 6 shows that there are significant differences between the Parkinson and control group in both cases: table 6, column 1 (traditional interpretation) and table 6, column 5 (alternative interpretation, starting from the point of view that "word production 2" test reflects, in addition, a kind of higher-order "shifting aptitude"); as the regression of the shift phase scores on baseline scores was not parallel in the latter case (table 6, column 4) within-group regression was used for the statistical analysis (table 6, column 5).…”
Section: Deficits At the Cognitive Levelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Interference with the functional interaction between dopamine-dependent associative processes in the basolateral amygdala and glutamate-dependent processes in the NAc core using bilateral infusions of the D 1/2/3 receptor antagonist ␣-flupenthixol or the AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist LY293558 (3SR, 4aRS, 6RS, 8aRS-6-[2-(iH-tetrazol-5-yl)ethyl]-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-decahydroiso-quinoline-3-carboxylic acid), respectively, reduced cuemaintained cocaine seeking (Di Ciano and Everitt, 2004). Conversely, the role of the NAc shell region on behavior in response to contextual cues (Crombag et al, 2008) may derive from its anatomical connections with the hippocampus (Van den Bercken and Cools, 1982;Groenewegen et al, 1987;McDonald and White, 1993;Floresco et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%