1989
DOI: 10.1042/cs0770167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a Decreased Noradrenaline Sensitivity in Mesenteric Resistance Vessels from Rats with Chemical Renal Medullectomy

Abstract: 1. Chemical renal medullectomy was performed in Wistar rats by intraperitoneal injection of 2-bromoethylamine hydrobromide (200 mg/kg body weight). The effect of this treatment upon blood pressure and mesenteric vascular reactivity and morphology was studied 3 weeks after treatment. 2. Blood pressure was significantly raised in medullectomized rats. The indirect systolic pressures (means +/- SEM) were 112 +/- 2.4 mmHg (14.9 +/- 0.32 kPa) and 123 +/- 3.5 mmHg (16.4 +/- 0.5 kPa) (P less than 0.02) for control (n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have also demonstrated that hypertension induced by chemical renal medullectomy is associated with a reduced NE sensitivity in mesenteric resistance arteries before significant medial growth occurs. 43 In the present experiment, there were no significant differences in media stress between femoral resistance arteries either between strains or between protected and unprotected arteries. Therefore, any differences in active tension or active pressure must be a consequence of altered arterial geometric design.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…We have also demonstrated that hypertension induced by chemical renal medullectomy is associated with a reduced NE sensitivity in mesenteric resistance arteries before significant medial growth occurs. 43 In the present experiment, there were no significant differences in media stress between femoral resistance arteries either between strains or between protected and unprotected arteries. Therefore, any differences in active tension or active pressure must be a consequence of altered arterial geometric design.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%