1949
DOI: 10.2307/2394394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence Excluding Mutations, Polysomy, and Polyploidy as Possible Causes of Non-Mendelian Segregations in Saccharomyces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1949
1949
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…… The gene‐conversion hypothesis does not lend itself at the present time to critical test, and therefore depends for its validation on the exclusion of other explanations based on known genetic mechanisms … Mundkur273 has demonstrated the inadequacy of the Winge and Roberts410 hypothesis that accounts for these ratios in terms of an extra mitosis in the formation of ascospores … [and] has excluded272 polyploidy as a factor … on the grounds that it will not account for all the irregularities ……”
Section: Lindegren's Controversies With Wingementioning
confidence: 99%
“…… The gene‐conversion hypothesis does not lend itself at the present time to critical test, and therefore depends for its validation on the exclusion of other explanations based on known genetic mechanisms … Mundkur273 has demonstrated the inadequacy of the Winge and Roberts410 hypothesis that accounts for these ratios in terms of an extra mitosis in the formation of ascospores … [and] has excluded272 polyploidy as a factor … on the grounds that it will not account for all the irregularities ……”
Section: Lindegren's Controversies With Wingementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "biomarker" was used for the first time in 1973 to indicate the presence or absence of biological material. However, the concept is older, referenced as a "biochemical marker" in 1949 (12) and "biological marker" in 1957 (13).…”
Section: What Are Biomarkers? Evolution Of Biomarkers Through Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, Winkler's theory received little support until Lindegren and his associates (Lindegren, 1949(Lindegren, , 1953Mundkur, 1949 In what follows we will disregard the numerous sources of error which should be considered in tetrad analyses: (s) overlapping of generations, which carries with it a grave risk in the study of yeast genetics, (2) mutation, which here just as in all other organisms can lead to deviations from the expected segregation, (3) adaptation to the ability to ferment certain sugars or to grow in the absence of certain growth substances, which can lead to analytical difficulties, (.) cytoplasmic inheritance of certain respiratory enzymes, which has been shown through the work of Ephrussi (1953) and his associates to exist in yeasts, and () polyploidy, which could easily lead to abnormal segregation, although its occurrence in yeasts has not yet been established with certainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%