2004
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/84.1.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence-Based Rating of Upper-Extremity Motor Function Tests Used for People Following a Stroke

Abstract: Introduction. Tests of upper-extremity motor function used for people following a stroke have been described, but reliability and validity (psychometric properties) of measurements obtained with these tests have not been consistently established. This investigation was performed: (1) to review literature relative to upper-extremity motor function testing during rehabilitation following a stroke, (2) to develop selection criteria for identifying these tests in the literature, and (3) to rate the tests relative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At baseline, we found the CAM to be more sensitive than the MMSE in predicting responder status, with Responders scoring 6 points higher than Non-Responders on the CAM, consistent with research showing that patients with milder dementia may show greater improvement with shunting (28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…At baseline, we found the CAM to be more sensitive than the MMSE in predicting responder status, with Responders scoring 6 points higher than Non-Responders on the CAM, consistent with research showing that patients with milder dementia may show greater improvement with shunting (28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Clinical outcome measures at different ICF levels were selected. On body functions and structures level, the Motricity Index (MI) [36], active maximum and 10" sustained shoulder range of motion (ROM) by means of the mini digital protractor inclinometer and Jamar handgrip strength [37] were performed.…”
Section: Descriptive and Clinical Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pinch grip was measured with an electronic pinchmeter. Hand dexterity was determined by 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) (9) . Assessment of thumb IP and MCP range of motion was performed preoperatively and at postoperative 6 th , 8 th and 12 th weeks.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%