Evidence‐based practice and clinical reasoning in occupational therapy: A cross‐sectional survey in Chile

Abstract

Introduction Evidence‐based practice (EBP) is a critical framework for supporting clinical decision‐making that has been increasingly promoted in occupational therapy over the last 20 years. Discipline‐specific EBP frameworks and resources have emerged, primarily created by scholars from developed countries. However, EBP has received limited attention in literature published in developing and non‐English speaking countries. This study aimed to explore Chilean occupational therapists’ perceptions of EBP, factors influencing the adoption of EBP and sources of information used to inform clinical decision‐making. Methods A cross‐sectional online survey of Chilean occupational therapists included socio‐demographic information, closed questions using a fivepoint Likert scale and open‐ended questions. Numerical data were summarised using frequencies and percentages. Cross‐tabulations explored relationships between variables. Narrative data from openended responses were analysed deductively using content analysis. Results Complete surveys were returned by 192 Chilean respondents. The majority of participants (68.3%) defined EBP as the use of research knowledge only and perceived EBP as useful and important. The most significant barriers to the application of research knowledge included: lack of time (68.2%), an emerging research culture (67.7%) and restricted access to scientific literature (56.8%). Additionally, Chilean occupational therapists did not feel confident finding, appraising and integrating research evidence. Of the four sources of knowledge used in EBP, participants predominantly relied on clinical observations of clients (99.5%), their clinical expertise (89.1%), and discussions with the multidisciplinary team (78.1%) and other occupational therapists (40.1%), to inform clinical decision‐making. Conclusion Language barriers, lack of time, scarcity of locally produced research, and an emergent research culture within Chile impede occupational therapists’ ability to implement EBP. The adoption of EBP can facilitate access to contemporary occupational therapy knowledge powerfully guide clinical reasoning, and build local research capacity. Building research partnerships and collaborations with the international scientific community are crucial to the global achievement of EBP.

Rehabilitation Practices Delivered by Physical and Occupational Therapists to Brazilian Children With Congenital Zika Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study

“… 14 The literature shows that the main barriers to implementing evidence-based practice by PTs and OTs are lack of time, publication language, lack of statistical knowledge, and limited access and employer support, as well as challenges in identifying high-quality studies, notably in low- and middle-income countries. 32 , 33 Evidence-based practice becomes even more challenging in newly identified health conditions and requires efforts from the scientific community. 34 Strategies to overcome these barriers involve knowledge translation, which includes adequate financial and physical resources, management support, training, and continuing education programs.…”

Intuition oder Evidenz?

“…Mit steigender Erfahrung werden Entscheidungen von Tanz-und Bewegungstherapeut*innen intuitiver getroffen. Dieses Vertrauen auf die Intuition wurde auch bei Entscheidungsprozessen in der Ergotherapie beschrieben [21]. Festzuhalten ist, dass Entscheidungen zwar teilweise intuitiv getroffen werden, diese Intuition jedoch auf den Erfahrungen der Therapeut*innen beruht, welche wiederum Bestandteil evidenzbasierter Praxis ist.…”

Elizabeth Casson Memorial Lecture 2022: Optimising performance, clinical and economic outcomes in occupational therapy service delivery

“…Evidence-based practice provides a critical framework to guide clinical reasoning and decision-making in OT practice (Garcia et al, 2021). The current concept of EBP consists of different components.…”