2014
DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence-based outcomes for mesh-based surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

Abstract: Mesh significantly improves anatomical outcomes with sacrocolpopexy and vaginal repair. Mesh does create the unique complication which can be reduced with training and proper patient selection. Further development of better materials is vital rather than reverting to tissue-based repair. Ultimately, the decision to use mesh should be based upon a patient's personal goals and preferences after an informed conversation with her physician.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly true since the introduction of synthetic mesh, which seems to provide superior anatomical, functional and subjective cure rates in comparison with a surgical suspension using native tissue [13]. However, overall success rates in the long-lasting period varied greatly depending on the grade of prolapse and the compartment involved in it, and finally on the surgical approach (abdominal or vaginal route).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true since the introduction of synthetic mesh, which seems to provide superior anatomical, functional and subjective cure rates in comparison with a surgical suspension using native tissue [13]. However, overall success rates in the long-lasting period varied greatly depending on the grade of prolapse and the compartment involved in it, and finally on the surgical approach (abdominal or vaginal route).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable attention has been paid to the anterior vaginal compartment, as it is the most common location for prolapse and also the most likely to recur after surgical repair [22]. Research has consistently found improved anatomic success with use of synthetic mesh compared to anterior colporrhaphy but no difference in patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life and dyspareunia [23][24][25].…”
Section: Evidence For and Against Mesh And Graft Use Anterior Vaginalmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another review [18] focusing on outcomes after mesh-based surgery reported that mesh did not cause more dyspareunia or functional symptoms than traditional repairs. It demonstrated that, the extremely poor 1-year anatomic success rates of native tissue repair for POP, progressively declined over time.…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%