2018
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/u78a6
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Everything Matters: The ReproNim Perspective on Reproducible Neuroimaging

Abstract:

There has been a recent major upsurge in the concerns about reproducibility in many areas of science. Within the neuroimaging domain, one approach is to promote reproducibility is to target the re-executability of the publication. The information supporting such re-executability can enable the detailed examination of how an initial finding generalizes across changes in the processing approach, and sampled population, in a controlled scientific fashion. ReproNim: A Center for Reproducible Neuroimaging Comput… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have provided an example “publication” with four supplementary files (Ghosh et al, 2017a), the: (1) data file, (2) workflow file, (3) execution environment specification, and (4) results. In this example, the data is from 24 publically accessible typically developing subjects between the ages of 10–15 that have a structural scan at 3 Tesla available from the 1000 Functional Connectomes Project at NITRC (doi 10.18116/C6C592; Kennedy, 2017). The workflow is a FSL-based (version 5.0.9) assessment of total brain, gray and white matter and subcortical structural volumes and is accessible at doi: 10.5281/zenodo.800758, (Ghosh et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have provided an example “publication” with four supplementary files (Ghosh et al, 2017a), the: (1) data file, (2) workflow file, (3) execution environment specification, and (4) results. In this example, the data is from 24 publically accessible typically developing subjects between the ages of 10–15 that have a structural scan at 3 Tesla available from the 1000 Functional Connectomes Project at NITRC (doi 10.18116/C6C592; Kennedy, 2017). The workflow is a FSL-based (version 5.0.9) assessment of total brain, gray and white matter and subcortical structural volumes and is accessible at doi: 10.5281/zenodo.800758, (Ghosh et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We base our methods on the ideas of replication and generalization. Because these terms, along with reproducibility, re-execution, and robustness are used in various ways in the literature (Goodman et al, 2016;Kennedy et al, 2019;McNaught and Wilkinson, 1997;Patil et al, 2016;Plesser, 2017), we begin by explaining our usage. Scientific experimentalists typically set out to make a measurement that can be replicated.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Neurolex, as InterLex was developed after the FAIR principles became well known, it issues FAIR identifiers in the form of CURIES as well as full URIs. InterLex is being used as a vocabulary management system by several neuroscience-related projects in addition to SPARC, including ReproNIM (Kennedy et al, 2019) and the Open Data Commons for Spinal Cord Injury (Callahan et al, 2017). These latter two projects are also using InterLex to store common data elements and custom data elements and relate them to ontological terms.…”
Section: Adding and Extending Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%