Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3201064.3201069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Everybody Thinks Online Participation is Great - for Somebody Else

Abstract: Based on a case study from the Green Party Germany, we discuss the expectations and potential effects of the introduction of new online participation opportunities. These methods are often used in hopes of drawing in a wider group of participants, but existing literature on digital inequality suggests that this is unlikely to happen. Applying a mixed methods approach, we investigate how likely the expectations related to these new opportunities are to be met. We used semi-structure interviews to draw out what … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a reoccurring theme in how these tools are developed: Volunteers start to put together tools based on use-cases they see themselves; then the tools are taken up by other groups within the party; and ultimately the tools and their development are taken on by the party centrally, who will also fund their hosting and development going forward. This order of proceedings is likely due to earlier attempts to develop and implement tools top-down; the internal knowledge-management tool and social network Wurzelwerk was developed externally, and the attempts to implement and gain users for it were unsuccessful, as members were not convinced of its use, or usability (Heinrich and Spitz, 2014;Thuermer et al, 2018).…”
Section: Tool Requirements and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a reoccurring theme in how these tools are developed: Volunteers start to put together tools based on use-cases they see themselves; then the tools are taken up by other groups within the party; and ultimately the tools and their development are taken on by the party centrally, who will also fund their hosting and development going forward. This order of proceedings is likely due to earlier attempts to develop and implement tools top-down; the internal knowledge-management tool and social network Wurzelwerk was developed externally, and the attempts to implement and gain users for it were unsuccessful, as members were not convinced of its use, or usability (Heinrich and Spitz, 2014;Thuermer et al, 2018).…”
Section: Tool Requirements and Usementioning
confidence: 99%