53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2014.7039816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-triggered pinning control of complex networks with switching topologies

Abstract: This paper investigates the problem of eventtriggered pinning control for the synchronization of networks of nonlinear dynamical agents onto a desired reference trajectory. The pinned agents are those that have access to the reference trajectory. We consider both static and switching topologies. We prove that the system is well posed and identify conditions under which the network achieves exponential convergence. A lower bound for the rate of convergence is also derived. Numerical examples demonstrating the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the triggering function designed in Li et al (2015) still need to decouple the actual states of the nodes. Hence, we are eager to consider the synchronization problem of complex networks via distributed event-triggered diffusions, which has rarely been considered (Liuzza et al 2013;Adaldo et al 2014;Li et al 2015;Gao et al 2014;Zhou et al 2015a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the triggering function designed in Li et al (2015) still need to decouple the actual states of the nodes. Hence, we are eager to consider the synchronization problem of complex networks via distributed event-triggered diffusions, which has rarely been considered (Liuzza et al 2013;Adaldo et al 2014;Li et al 2015;Gao et al 2014;Zhou et al 2015a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of the event-control law proposed in Dimarogonas et al (2012) is that it requires continuous communication between neighboring nodes to constantly monitor whether the designed events occur or not. In Almeida et al (2014), Liuzza et al (2013), Adaldo et al (2014Adaldo et al ( , 2015, the authors studied the event-triggered consensus of multiagent systems. A limitation of the event-control law proposed in Almeida et al (2014), Liuzza et al (2013) and Adaldo et al (2014Adaldo et al ( , 2015 is that their triggering threshold functions only depend on continuous-time nonincreasing threshold function, which is independent of the states of nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [30], the authors addressed the problem of event-triggered pinning synchronization considering linear diffusive coupling and unweighted network topologies. In this paper, a more general setup is considered, namely, weighted switching topologies with generic linear interactions are investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%