2015
DOI: 10.1109/tcns.2015.2428531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-Triggered Pinning Control of Switching Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed event‐triggering mechanism can be simply implemented without the adaptive mirror model used in the work of Li and Yang since only one triggering condition is required. In addition, the input‐to‐state stability assumption in the work of Postoyan et al and the global Lipschitz requirement in the work of Adaldo et al were both removed …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed event‐triggering mechanism can be simply implemented without the adaptive mirror model used in the work of Li and Yang since only one triggering condition is required. In addition, the input‐to‐state stability assumption in the work of Postoyan et al and the global Lipschitz requirement in the work of Adaldo et al were both removed …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, this system can automatically be reinstated, unlike the auxiliary system in the works of Chen et al and Jin . (iii) Different from the event‐triggered control methods in other related works, the proposed method can guarantee that the tracking error does not exceed a prespecified performance bound with finite‐time convergence. (iv) By introducing a smooth approximation function, the control signals are continuous and differentiable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Event-triggered control scheme is updated only when an event is triggered, which is different from the traditional timedriven control scheme (Adaldo et al, 2015;Forni, Galeani, Nesic, & Zaccarian, 2014;Hu, Cao, Hu, & Guo, 2015a;Wang, Zhang, & Han, 2015;. Some results onevent-triggered consensus of multi-agent systems have been obtained recently (Guo, Ding, & Han, 2014;Hu, Cao, Hu, & Guo, 2015b;Weng & Yue, 2015;Zhang, Hao, Zhang, & Wang, 2014;Zhang, Feng, Yan, & Chen, 2014;Zhou, Liao, Huang, & Chen, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of the event-control law proposed in Dimarogonas et al (2012) is that it requires continuous communication between neighboring nodes to constantly monitor whether the designed events occur or not. In Almeida et al (2014), Liuzza et al (2013), Adaldo et al (2014Adaldo et al ( , 2015, the authors studied the event-triggered consensus of multiagent systems. A limitation of the event-control law proposed in Almeida et al (2014), Liuzza et al (2013) and Adaldo et al (2014Adaldo et al ( , 2015 is that their triggering threshold functions only depend on continuous-time nonincreasing threshold function, which is independent of the states of nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Almeida et al (2014), Liuzza et al (2013), Adaldo et al (2014Adaldo et al ( , 2015, the authors studied the event-triggered consensus of multiagent systems. A limitation of the event-control law proposed in Almeida et al (2014), Liuzza et al (2013) and Adaldo et al (2014Adaldo et al ( , 2015 is that their triggering threshold functions only depend on continuous-time nonincreasing threshold function, which is independent of the states of nodes. In Zhu et al (2014), the authors studied event-based consensus of general linear multi-agent systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%