1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(97)00783-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-related potentials in Parkinsonian patients under auditory discrimination tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors agree that the main power of P300 is in the delta range (Demiralp et al, 1999;Karakas et al, 2000;Klimesch et al, 2000;Klimesch et al, 2006). The lower -ERS in PP in the late post-stimulus period, which becomes -ERD in some recordings, could explain the lower P3 amplitude observed in PP (Philipova et al, 1997). Our patients were medicated by L-dopa drugs and this medication may have had some effect on the present findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many authors agree that the main power of P300 is in the delta range (Demiralp et al, 1999;Karakas et al, 2000;Klimesch et al, 2000;Klimesch et al, 2006). The lower -ERS in PP in the late post-stimulus period, which becomes -ERD in some recordings, could explain the lower P3 amplitude observed in PP (Philipova et al, 1997). Our patients were medicated by L-dopa drugs and this medication may have had some effect on the present findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Many electroencephalographic (EEG) studies on PD have used the event-related potential (ERP) method, where the early modal dependent and obligatory N1 and P2 components permit analysis of sensory events while the later N2 and P3 potentials reflect the cognitive processes involving the assessment of stimuli, decision making, strategy selection and recognition memory. ERP investigations have shown P3 predominantly with prolonged latencies and/or diminished amplitudes for Parkinsonian patients (PP) when compared to healthy subjects (HS) (Evarts et al, 1981;Tachibana et al, 1992;Philipova et al, 1997;Wascher et al, 1997;Minamoto et al, 2001;Antal et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2002). Such results have been interpreted as electrophysiological signs of cognitive slowing with respect to stimulus classification and attentional processing (Robertson & Empson, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lagopoulos et al [16] found no difference of P3 amplitude in PD patients compared with controls; disease duration was around 5 years, but cognitive functioning of the declaredly nondemented patients was not tested. Philipova et al [13] and Raudino et al [12] found decreased P3 amplitude in nondemented PD patients. Philipova et al [13] Tanaka/Koenig/Pascual-Marqui/Hirata/ Kochi/Lehmann intellectual assessment, but their patients showed poor task performance compared with controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Philipova et al [13] and Raudino et al [12] found decreased P3 amplitude in nondemented PD patients. Philipova et al [13] Tanaka/Koenig/Pascual-Marqui/Hirata/ Kochi/Lehmann intellectual assessment, but their patients showed poor task performance compared with controls. Raudino et al [12] did not report age, duration, and severity of disease of their nondemented patients; for demented PD patients (the only such study we are aware of), they reported further decrease in P3 amplitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation