2009
DOI: 10.1080/02699930802284158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-based prospective memory in depression: The impact of cue focality

Abstract: This study is the first to compare event-based prospective memory performance in individuals with depression and healthy controls. The degree to which self-initiated processing is required to perform the prospective memory task was varied. Twenty-eight individuals with depression and 32 healthy controls worked on a computerized prospective memory task. Prospective cues were either presented focally or nonfocally to the ongoing activity. Collapsing data across both conditions, controls outperformed individuals … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(38 reference statements)
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Event-based PM may be impaired in clinically depressed individuals, but not in nonclinical samples. Supporting this idea, only Altgassen et al (2009) who used a clinically depressed sample found group differences in nonfocal event-based PM compared with normal controls. However, the MPT model requires a large number of observations to produce reliable parameter estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Event-based PM may be impaired in clinically depressed individuals, but not in nonclinical samples. Supporting this idea, only Altgassen et al (2009) who used a clinically depressed sample found group differences in nonfocal event-based PM compared with normal controls. However, the MPT model requires a large number of observations to produce reliable parameter estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Accordingly, a relationship between working memory and PM performance has been shown for nonfocal tasks only (e.g., Brewer et al, 2010;Rose, Rendell, McDaniel, Aberle, & Kliegel, 2010). Thus, the results obtained by Altgassen et al (2009) suggest that depression-related PM impairments are more likely when the task requires relatively high amounts of cognitive resources as is the case with nonfocal tasks and multiple targets. However, Kliegel and Jäger (2006) also used a nonfocal PM task with multiple targets.…”
Section: Depression and Event-based Pm Performancementioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is reportedly a high co-morbidity between substance abuse and various psychiatric conditions (Regier et al, 1990). This is particularly important in the study of PM, as research has revealed PM impairments in samples of individuals with depression (Rude, Hertel, Jarrold, Covich & Hedlund, 1999;Altgassen, Kliegel & Martin, 2009), and schizophrenia Henry, Rendell, Kliegel & Altgassen, 2007). Four studies included some measure of psychopathology, either in the form of the HADS Heffernan et al, 2010;Bartholomew et al, 2010) or the Symptom Checklist-90…”
Section: Confounding Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%