2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evapotranspiration components determined by stable isotope, sap flow and eddy covariance techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
328
1
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 418 publications
(344 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
10
328
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Bare-soil evaporation was not measured independently in this study owing to our lack of recording microlysimeters and the difficulties in obtaining a spatially-representative estimate for an entire growing season from small-scale micro-lysimeters. Nevertheless, it is a common practice to estimate a component flux as a residual (Barbour et al, 2005;Dugas et al, 1996;Scott et al, 2003;Williams et al, 2004), and we can check whether the independent estimates of T and ET are compatible. As the time from the last precipitation event increased in an interstorm period, it is reasonable to expect that T increasingly dominates an ET signal because surface soil rapidly dries, increasing the resistance to water flux from deeper layers despite a large demand from the atmosphere (Wythers et al, 1999).…”
Section: Transpiration and Evaporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bare-soil evaporation was not measured independently in this study owing to our lack of recording microlysimeters and the difficulties in obtaining a spatially-representative estimate for an entire growing season from small-scale micro-lysimeters. Nevertheless, it is a common practice to estimate a component flux as a residual (Barbour et al, 2005;Dugas et al, 1996;Scott et al, 2003;Williams et al, 2004), and we can check whether the independent estimates of T and ET are compatible. As the time from the last precipitation event increased in an interstorm period, it is reasonable to expect that T increasingly dominates an ET signal because surface soil rapidly dries, increasing the resistance to water flux from deeper layers despite a large demand from the atmosphere (Wythers et al, 1999).…”
Section: Transpiration and Evaporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecosystem ET has been partitioned into bare-soil evaporation, interception reservoir evaporation, and transpiration from the overstory and understory vegetation (e.g. Barbour et al, 2005;Dugas et al, 1996;Ham et al, 1990;Scott et al, 2003;Williams et al, 2004;Yepez et al, 2003). Often, these studies have been over relatively short time periods (days to weeks) and data for woody plant encroached areas are sparse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although calibration focused on the wound width, it will also account for possible uncertainties in sapwood moisture content, sapwood density and the upscaling from individual trees to orchard scale. Similar sap flow calibrations have been performed by Williams et al (2004) in an olive orchard assuming evaporation from the soil is negligible and by using a combination (Köstner et al 1992). The advantage of this method of calibration is that it can be performed in field without the use of weighing lysimeters, which although ideal, are expensive to install and require a number of years for the tree planted in the lysimeter to reach an adequate size for measurement.…”
Section: Sap Flow and Transpirationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although such information provides a powerful constraint on model construction and water management, our ability to quantify the T from ET remains limited, since it is difficult to measure independently at the ecosystem scale 2) . Historically, eddy covariance based technique approaches have been used to partition ET fluxes, however, it is always derived by incorporating measurements of a single reference height above the vegetation and some empirical formulas, T and E is often not independently verified with measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, eddy covariance based technique approaches have been used to partition ET fluxes, however, it is always derived by incorporating measurements of a single reference height above the vegetation and some empirical formulas, T and E is often not independently verified with measurements. Although recently the transpiration measurement by sap flux sensor, evaporation measurement by soil chamber have been combined into the eddy covariance, a complicating issue is the mismatch in footprints between the landscape-scale fluxes derived by eddy covariance and the more localized fluxes obtained by these instruments 1), 2) . Not long ago, measurements of the stable isotope have been utilized for the purpose of ET partitioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%