2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01941.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in a Chesapeake Bay wetland under carbon dioxide enrichment

Abstract: Wetlands evapotranspire more water than other ecosystems, including agricultural, forest and grassland ecosystems. However, the effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (C0 2 ) concentration (C a ) on wetland evapotranspiration (ET) are largely unknown. Here, we present data on 12 years of measurements of ET, net ecosystem C0 2 exchange (NEE), and ecosystem water use efficiency (EWUE, i.e. NEE/ET) at 13:00-15:00 hours in July and August for a Scirpus olneyi (C3 sedge) community and a Spartina patens (C4 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(63 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is perhaps more likely that lower canopy‐level transpiration could have reduced bulk flow of deeper (below 80 cm) porewater [NH4+] to the surface (Mcdonald et al ., ). Decreased canopy‐level transpiration under elevated CO 2 has been documented in a nearby CO 2 enrichment study in this wetland (Li et al ., ) and live roots extend beyond 80 cm in these plots (personal observation). Although total denitrification rates remain a highly uncertain component of the N cycle at this site, our results suggest that rising CO 2 will not change, let alone increase, N accumulation or retention by strongly N‐limited marshes without additional N inputs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is perhaps more likely that lower canopy‐level transpiration could have reduced bulk flow of deeper (below 80 cm) porewater [NH4+] to the surface (Mcdonald et al ., ). Decreased canopy‐level transpiration under elevated CO 2 has been documented in a nearby CO 2 enrichment study in this wetland (Li et al ., ) and live roots extend beyond 80 cm in these plots (personal observation). Although total denitrification rates remain a highly uncertain component of the N cycle at this site, our results suggest that rising CO 2 will not change, let alone increase, N accumulation or retention by strongly N‐limited marshes without additional N inputs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of this physiological forcing depends on the degree of stomatal control over evapotranspiration [23]. A number of field-based experiments have demonstrated the reduction of evapotranspiration in a CO 2 enriched environment [24][25][26]. Reduced evapotranspiration allows a relatively higher proportion of water to form runoff, a renewable water resource.…”
Section: Co 2 Fertilisation and Physiological Forcingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated with the change in land use and cover, land management practices such as irrigation, fertilizer and/or manure application, residue return, and tillage are recognized as important anthropogenic measures to improve crop yield, and hence, modify the carbon, water, and nitrogen cycles in agricultural land Zhang et al, 2006;Lu et al, 2009), which covers around 20% of the total land area in MA. Although a few studies have assessed the impacts of environmental changes on carbon and water interactions Yu et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2008;Li et al, 2010), none of them has addressed the changes in WUE in response to both natural and human perturbations at a regional scale. Thus, an integrated research is needed to understand how these environmental changes interactively affect carbon and water dynamics in MA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%