2004
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.70.053409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaporative cooling at low trap depth

Abstract: A quantitative, analytic model of evaporative cooling covering both the small-͑Ͻ4͒ and large-͑Ͼ4͒ regimes is presented. is the dimensionless parameter defined as the trap depth divided by the temperature of the trapped sample. Although some of the same general properties present at large are also present at small , there are significant quantitative differences. These differences must be taken into account in order to accurately extract from the trapping data quantitative measurements of, for example, collisio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We include in our model the density dependent loss processes, assuming that the density profile of the atoms is, at all time, well described by the Boltzmann distribution at thermal equilibrium in the non-truncated trap. This relies on two main assumptions: first, the elastic collision rate is large enough to reach thermal equilibrium on the timescale of the experiment (defined by the dominant loss process); second, the trap depth is large enough compared to the magnetic trap temperature, so that one can neglect modifications in the thermal distri-bution linked to the finite depth of the potential ( [7], [8]). In our experiment, thermal equilibrium is most likely not reached at the beginning of the loading of the MT, when the number of atoms is still small.…”
Section: Theoretical Model and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We include in our model the density dependent loss processes, assuming that the density profile of the atoms is, at all time, well described by the Boltzmann distribution at thermal equilibrium in the non-truncated trap. This relies on two main assumptions: first, the elastic collision rate is large enough to reach thermal equilibrium on the timescale of the experiment (defined by the dominant loss process); second, the trap depth is large enough compared to the magnetic trap temperature, so that one can neglect modifications in the thermal distri-bution linked to the finite depth of the potential ( [7], [8]). In our experiment, thermal equilibrium is most likely not reached at the beginning of the loading of the MT, when the number of atoms is still small.…”
Section: Theoretical Model and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…η is the ratio of the trap depth to the trapped atom temperature, and f (η) is given in equation (11) of ref [8] (which is valid for η ≥ 4).…”
Section: Theoretical Model and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Approximations are usually made to arrive at analytic results for required quantities (e.g., [19]) in order to facilitate solution of the differential equations. This is straightforward for high-η conditions [9] and also in situations of low-η and with sufficient trap symmetry [20]. For low-η conditions and traps that lack spatial symmetry, numerical evaluation of statistical mechanical quantities is the only option, and that is the approach we follow, with the exception of calculation of pot .…”
Section: Description Of the Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, this yields analytic expressions for thermodynamic quantities and allows approximation of optical dipole traps [18] as parabolic potentials [19]. By taking advantage of the high degree of spatial symmetry in a linear potential, analytic expressions for thermodynamic quantities were derived for the low-η situation (η < 4) in this particular geometry [20]. It is worth emphasizing that the model of Luiten et al [10] is, in principle, valid for low η as long as the assumptions of ergodicity and a truncated Boltzmann distribution are also valid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%