2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaporation of squeezed water droplets between two parallel hydrophobic/superhydrophobic surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2d. Similar to our findings of droplet evaporation between two parallel hydrophobic surfaces [35], the apparently prolonged evaporation time (2 hours) of the droplets dwelling between non-parallel surfaces indicates that evaporation was also greatly suppressed therein due to the substantial vapor enrichment within the confined space. However, the continuously shrinking contact line and the contact angle distribution of the evaporating droplet in the configuration of non-parallel surfaces are not symmetric anymore.…”
Section: Evaporation-triggered Lateral Transport Of Droplets Confined...supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2d. Similar to our findings of droplet evaporation between two parallel hydrophobic surfaces [35], the apparently prolonged evaporation time (2 hours) of the droplets dwelling between non-parallel surfaces indicates that evaporation was also greatly suppressed therein due to the substantial vapor enrichment within the confined space. However, the continuously shrinking contact line and the contact angle distribution of the evaporating droplet in the configuration of non-parallel surfaces are not symmetric anymore.…”
Section: Evaporation-triggered Lateral Transport Of Droplets Confined...supporting
confidence: 88%
“…In our previous study [35], the evaporation of squeezed droplets between two parallel hydrophobic/superhydrophobic surfaces was found to be significantly suppressed due to the vapor enrichment inside the confined space. Thus, in this work, we assume the evaporation of confined droplets between two non-parallel surfaces as a quasi-steady process, which means the transient shape of an evaporating droplet could be approximated by its profile at the equilibrium state.…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…During the drop evaporation, two accepted theories for profile evolution are constant contact radius mode (the droplet is pinned to the surface and the height of the drop falls as the fluid evaporates) and constant contact angle mode (the radius decreases but the contact angle remains constant) [ 34 ]. In reality a combination of both usually occurs until the fluid is completely evaporated [ 30 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for the sake of simplicity, here, we consider that the volume of the squeezed droplet forms an effective cylinder, being r d the cylinder-equivalent radius for the drop base. More accurate calculations accounting for either the concavity [22] or the convexity [23] of the liquid-air interfacial area can be found in recent papers. On the other hand, for ideal gases ( )…”
Section: The Evaporation Kinetics Of Confined Dropletsmentioning
confidence: 99%