2019
DOI: 10.4000/activites.4554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Évaluer l’utilité dans le contexte des technologies émergentes pour identifier des besoins latents : éléments issus d’une analyse des interactions en situation d’usage

Abstract: Éditeur ARPACT-Association Recherches et Pratiques sur les ACTivités Référence électronique Émilie Loup-Escande et Jean-Marie Burkhardt, « Évaluer l'utilité dans le contexte des technologies émergentes pour identifier des besoins latents : éléments issus d'une analyse des interactions en situation d'usage »,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it seems judicious to implement an assessment method that does not involve end-users (eg, ergonomic inspection) in order to identify the major usability problems of a version 1 of a prototype in order to propose recommendations to be implemented in a version 2 so as to limit the risk of rejection of the technology by the real end-users (Laumer & Eckhardt, 2012), as was done for the consumer-centered assessment of the web portal. The assessments of the VERTPOM-BANK® software and the private web portal also show that user tests and usage situations are necessary to access objective and subjective data on the relevance of functionalities, usability difficulties associated with usability issues, and UX-related dimensions (Loup-Escande & Burkhardt, 2019). More precisely, while the ergonomic inspection of the VERTPOM-BANK® software made it possible to provide elements of correction to optimize the interface initially, the user tests proved to be conducive to discussions with the operators, thus making it possible to identify their expectations and to better situate the context in which the software will ultimately be implemented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it seems judicious to implement an assessment method that does not involve end-users (eg, ergonomic inspection) in order to identify the major usability problems of a version 1 of a prototype in order to propose recommendations to be implemented in a version 2 so as to limit the risk of rejection of the technology by the real end-users (Laumer & Eckhardt, 2012), as was done for the consumer-centered assessment of the web portal. The assessments of the VERTPOM-BANK® software and the private web portal also show that user tests and usage situations are necessary to access objective and subjective data on the relevance of functionalities, usability difficulties associated with usability issues, and UX-related dimensions (Loup-Escande & Burkhardt, 2019). More precisely, while the ergonomic inspection of the VERTPOM-BANK® software made it possible to provide elements of correction to optimize the interface initially, the user tests proved to be conducive to discussions with the operators, thus making it possible to identify their expectations and to better situate the context in which the software will ultimately be implemented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%