Evaluation von Technologiepolitik in Deutschland

Kuhlmann, Stefan; Holland, Doris

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-46964-0

Cited by 22 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The spread of evaluation is closely bound up with the increase in strategic programs (initiated by the EU Commission) to promote science and technology. In Germany the Federal Ministry for Research (then BMFT) was particularly active; between 1985 and 1993 some 50 large evaluation studies were commissioned [31], and in the years following the efforts did not slacken. As a rule, independent research institutes acted as evaluators on behalf of research policy administrators who are in charge of running the evaluated programs (i.e.…”

Section: Concepts and Areas Of Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of research and innovation policies: a discussion of trends with examples from Germany

Kuhlmann¹

2003

IJTM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent changes in the field of evaluation refer to new demands by politics, economies and society to extend the subject of evaluation processes to cross-sectoral research promotion programs and research institutions, and new developments within the research of evaluation itself. The paper presents an overview of these trends and consequences for the function and methods of evaluation of research and innovation policies against the background of recent German experiences.

show abstract

Section: Concepts and Areas Of Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of research and innovation policies: a discussion of trends with examples from Germany

Kuhlmann¹

2003

IJTM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Evaluation of RTD activities in some countries goes through an institutionalisation process, with a growing number of research organisations, actors and interests becoming engaged in evaluation. Meta-evaluations of practices reveal increases in the production of results for policy making, and evaluation is often perceived as a strategic instrument in decision making to achieve improved socioeconomic conditions (Georghiou, 1995;Kuhlmann and Holland, 1995;Kuhlmann and Heinze, 2002).…”

Section: The Framework Of Rtd Evaluations and Policy In Europementioning

confidence: 99%

RTD evaluation and policy in the European Research Area

Schmidt

2006

Evidence &Amp; Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

English Evaluation of Research and Technological Development (RTD) processes and outcomes is gaining importance in European policy as funds are reallocated to research and demands for accountability are growing. However, a common evaluation ground is not seen yet in Europe. The theme for this article is the landscape of RTD evaluations in Europe and their use in research and technology policy. Based on a comparative study of 22 European countries, concepts of public evaluations and their impacts on policy at meso-and macro-level are outlined and discussed. The article points to future needs and challenges with regard to the construction of public RTD evaluations and their use in policy, in particular with a view to creating the European Research Area (ERA). It concludes that some rethinking of evaluation concepts and practices is called for.

show abstract

“…Meta-evaluations of evaluation practices give evidence of an increasing production of evaluative information for public policymaking in the area of research and innovation (e.g. Georghiou 1995;Kuhlmann/Holland 1995;Kuhlmann/Heinze 2001). At the same time, experience shows that both the theory and practice of evaluation has undergone important developments over the past decade.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%