Evaluation of research and innovation policies: a discussion of trends with examples from Germany

Kuhlmann, Stefan

doi:10.1504/ijtm.2003.003366

Cited by 35 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 46 publications

(20 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…By contrast, the hospital and shopping mall Living labs indicate the importance of having strong commitment between core-actors and a passionate and somewhat risk-taking behavior in management, as well as adoption of a thorough multi-disciplinary and multi-domain approach. In addition, the case studies also reveal different roles of the university, ranging from merely an 'outsider' in ex-post evaluation to a fully integrated partner providing technology as well as management/monitoring and negotiation input, suggesting the importance of multiple roles (Kuhlmann, 2003).…”

Section: Summary Of Critical Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Living Labs as boundary-spanners between Triple Helix actors

Geenhuizen¹

2016

J. Contemp. East. Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Summary Of Critical Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Living Labs as boundary-spanners between Triple Helix actors

Geenhuizen¹

2016

J. Contemp. East. Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…There are a few are assessments focussing on a specific field or sector (e.g. Rip & Nederhof, 1986;Bressers, 1988;Parry, 1995Parry, & 2003Carew, 2005;Shapira & Wang, 2007;Fier & Heneric, 2009;Mansikkasalo & Söderholm, 2012) or a specific country or region (Larsen, 2000;Kuhlmann, 2003;Sanz-Menéndez & Cruz-Castro, 2005;Hoegselius, 2008;Persson, 2008;Sandhu & Anghel, 2010), but with these it is less clear how far one can generalise from that particular case.…”

Section: Within the European Union A Specific Randd Policy Instrument mentioning

confidence: 99%

R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know

Martin

2016

Industry and Innovation

123

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article (Accepted Version) http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Martin, Ben R (2016) R&D policy instruments -a critical review of what we do and don't know. Industry and Innovation, 23 (2). pp. 157-176. ISSN 1366157-176. ISSN -2716 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/58671/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse:Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University.Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available.Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. R&D Policy Instruments -a Critical Review of What We Do and Don't Know AbstractIn recent years, the term 'policy instrument' has been used more frequently with regard to R&D policy and innovation policy. What does this term mean? Where did it come from? What do we know about it, both with regard to the general field of policy studies but also in the specific context of R&D policy? This article examines the development of the notion of policy instruments as part of a body of research known as 'policy design'. Over the last 50 years, there has been substantial progress in setting policy design on a more systematic basis, with the development of established concepts and analytical frameworks, including various taxonomies of policy instruments. However, with just a few exceptions, this body of research seems to have had little impact in the world of R&D policy. The paper reviews the literature on R&D policy instruments. It identifies a number of challenges for R&D policy instruments in the light of four transitions -the shift from linear to systemic thinking about R&D and innovation, the shift from national governments to multi-level governance, the shift from individual actors to collaborations and networks, and the shift from individual policies to policy mixes. It sets out a research agenda for the study of R&D policy instruments, before ending with a number of conclusions.

show abstract

“…Hence, in order to assess the performance and institutional quality of an RIS both aspects must be considered. The policy evaluation-related literature agrees about the need to combine different approaches, methodologies and indicators to avoid a biased picture of system performance (KUHLMANN, 2003).…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, this simple focus on the empirical assessment of (R)IS performance (based on one or a number of fairly isolated indicators) may provide a biased picture. There is agreement in the literature about the lack of suitable measures with regard not only to benchmarking system performance, but also to the in-depth evaluation of the particular features of the system (KUHLMANN, 2003). Thus, there is an urgent need to achieve some balance between the data provided by empirical assessment and qualitative analyses in providing an evaluation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Benchmarking Regional Innovation Systems: the relevance of efficiency towards their performance.

Iturriagagoitia¹,

Mikel²

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AGRADECIMIENTOSQuisiera agradecer a todas aquellas personas que han participado de forma directa o indirecta en esta aventura que empecé al decidir venirme a Valencia.En primer lugar quisiera dar las gracias a Mónica García Melón, por ser mi primera referencia, saber soportar la cantidad de dudas que le planteé, animarme a empezar un doctorado y abrirme las puertas del departamento de par en par.En segundo lugar quisiera agradecer a Ignacio Fernández de Lucio la oportunidad que me brindó de entrar a formar parte de Ingenio cuando sólo era un estudiante de doctorado más. De igual modo, he de mostrar mi admiración hacia Antonio Gutierrez Gracia, por enseñarme a pensar en voz alta, dedicarme horas y horas de conversación, y demostrarme que es mucho más interesante estar entre fogones. Qué decir de Elena Castro Martínez. Simplemente eso, mi segunda madre aquí en Valencia.Una parte de este resultado también se debe a los compañeros de despacho con los que he tenido el placer de convivir (Oscar, Ester, Evita, Vicente, Liney y Xavi) y quienes han sabido soportar mis buenos y malos días. Mención especial merecen Marian, Peyu y Pepelu, por ser incondicionales, y a quienes llevaré siempre conmigo.No sé si para ellos será un orgullo o no haber sido una parte crucial en esta tesis, pero sin ellos, ésta no habría sido posible. Me refiero a mis dos directores. Por un lado, Fernando, quien aceptó ser mi director de tesis sin saber dónde se estaba metiendo, y por el otro, Jose Luis, quien me ha dado toda su confianza, y me ha apoyado hasta las últimas consecuencias. Gracias a los dos, espero que sigamos siendo los JJJ.Quisiera también agradecer a Jordi Molas, la oportunidad que me brindó de poder cumplir uno de mis sueños e ir a Finlandia para desarrollar allí parte de esta tesis. Dicha estancia no hubiera sido posible sin el categórico apoyo que Pirjo Kutinlahti y Terttu Luukkonen mostraron desde el primer momento en el que decidí ponerme en contacto con ellas, a pesar de no conocernos. De igual modo, agradecer el trato dado por los dueños del piso en el que viví en Otaniemi, Toni, Meri y Riita, por hacerme sentir uno más de la familia. Respecto a mis compañeros del VTT, no me cabe sino mostrar mi admiración por todos y cada uno de ellos. Gracias a Juha Oksanen por ser mi jefe y amigo desde el primer día, a Maija-Liisa Hylkilä por darme todo tipo de facilidades para formar parte de la organización, a Mariagrazia, Ville, Jari, Pekka, Robert, Torsti, Jukka, y a todos aquellos con los que compartí cafés, comidas, cenas y conversaciones. Acerca de mis suomalainen ystävykset… qué decir de Ville, Kristie, Marina, Daniela, Antti (*3), etc., que lo fueron, son y seguirán siendo todo.No podría olvidarme de personas que me han animado tanto, y por quienes tanta admiración y respeto siento: Mikel Landabaso, Elvira Uyarra, Mikel Gómez Uranga, Goio Etxebarria, Anton Borja y Mikel Olazarán.Quisiera también mostrar mi devoción por todos aquellos PhD students, hoy más que amigos, que he conocido a lo largo de estos últimos años, y con quienes...

show abstract

Evaluation of research and innovation policies: a discussion of trends with examples from Germany

Cited by 35 publications

References 46 publications

Living Labs as boundary-spanners between Triple Helix actors

Living Labs as boundary-spanners between Triple Helix actors

R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know

Benchmarking Regional Innovation Systems: the relevance of efficiency towards their performance.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About