2000
DOI: 10.1177/002221940003300105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation Practices for College Students with LD

Abstract: To examine current practices in the use of psychoeducational evaluations for service delivery, we surveyed 91 service providers to college students with learning disabilities. The three purposes of the survey were to determine (a) whether service delivery decisions are based on information from psychoeducational evaluations, (b) which sections of the psychoeducational report are most useful in making service delivery decisions, and (c) the respondents' satisfaction with the tests and measurements for service d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…turn, has consequences for academic placement, eligibility for disability services (Morgan, Sullivan, Darden, & Gregg, 1997;Ofiesh & McAfee, 2000), individualized educational planning (Kanaya, Scullin, & Ceci, 2003), Social Security benefit determinations (Reschly, Myers, & Hartel, 2002), and in some cases, whether or not one can be sentenced to death for criminal acts (Atkins v. Virginia, 2002). For measures such as the Wechsler Intelligence Scales, there is substantial validity evidence supporting their use with clinical populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…turn, has consequences for academic placement, eligibility for disability services (Morgan, Sullivan, Darden, & Gregg, 1997;Ofiesh & McAfee, 2000), individualized educational planning (Kanaya, Scullin, & Ceci, 2003), Social Security benefit determinations (Reschly, Myers, & Hartel, 2002), and in some cases, whether or not one can be sentenced to death for criminal acts (Atkins v. Virginia, 2002). For measures such as the Wechsler Intelligence Scales, there is substantial validity evidence supporting their use with clinical populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the postsecondary level, reliance on diagnostic test information to consider test accommodations is common practice (Gregg & Scott, 2000;Hagin, 2000;Ofiesh & McAfee, 2000;Scott, 2002;Educational Testing Service, 1998;National Board of Medical Examiners, 2001). Unlike the K-12 system, postsecondary students with LD do not have an IEP and operate independently of a special education teacher who could evaluate a student's classroom test-taking performance through, for example, performance-based measures.…”
Section: Use Of Psychoeducational Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is both anecdotal and empirical evidence that the educational backgrounds of DSPs are diverse. Some DSPs are not trained in basic psychometric principles, thus limiting their ability to interpret diagnostic information in terms of test-taking performance and its relationship to the test to be accommodated (Ofiesh & McAfee, 2000;Stiggins, 1991). Lack of knowledge regarding how to make appropriate accommodations with regard to test validity is not isolated to the postsecondary field.…”
Section: Need For Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One widely used measure of intelligence in adults is the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III; or its predecessors (e.g., Morris & Leuenberger, 1990;Morgan, et al, 1997;Ofiesh & McAfee, 2000). Ofiesh and McAfee (2000) indicated in survey results that the WAIS is the most frequently used IQ test for assessing the cognitive ability of college students receiving special services. While the WAIS-III is considered a valid and reliable test of intelligence, it takes 65 to 95 minutes to administer .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%