2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-016-5850-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of X-ray radiation shielding performance of barium sulphate-coated fabrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the mass attenuation coefficient of a commercial lead apron at 40 keV was 7.0 cm 2 ·g –1 , which was remarkably lower than that of Bi 28.2 @Bi 3.48 La 3.38 –NL (18.9 cm 2 ·g –1 ). 8 Previous literature reported that the mass attenuation coefficient of the fabric-based X-ray shielding material was 9.6 cm 2 ·g –1 , which was also uncompetitive if compared with Bi 28.2 @Bi 3.48 La 3.38 –NL . The comparison in the attenuation coefficient suggested that the prepared NL-based composite exhibited outstanding performance in X-ray shielding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the mass attenuation coefficient of a commercial lead apron at 40 keV was 7.0 cm 2 ·g –1 , which was remarkably lower than that of Bi 28.2 @Bi 3.48 La 3.38 –NL (18.9 cm 2 ·g –1 ). 8 Previous literature reported that the mass attenuation coefficient of the fabric-based X-ray shielding material was 9.6 cm 2 ·g –1 , which was also uncompetitive if compared with Bi 28.2 @Bi 3.48 La 3.38 –NL . The comparison in the attenuation coefficient suggested that the prepared NL-based composite exhibited outstanding performance in X-ray shielding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Previous literature reported that the mass attenuation coefficient of the fabric-based X-ray shielding material was 9.6 cm 2 •g −1 , which was also uncompetitive if compared with Bi 28.2 @Bi 3.48 La 3.38 −NL. 37 The comparison in the attenuation coefficient suggested that the prepared NL-based composite exhibited outstanding performance in X-ray shielding. The X-ray shielding performance comparison of the NLbased composite and polymer-based materials was also conducted, which indicated that the X-ray shielding ability of Bi 1.51 La 1.51 −PDMS and Bi 1.51 La 1.51 −ER was remarkably lower than that of Bi 1.51 La 1.51 −NL and Bi 28.2 @Bi 1.51 La 1.51 −NL (Figure S13).…”
Section: Radiation Protection Of Bimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has the disadvantage of not imparting the inherent properties of the fibers to the fabric because of their low flexibility and high rigidity [37][38][39]. In addition, it is difficult to reproduce the shielding performance because the shielding performance must be controlled by adjusting the coating thickness during the process [40,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if the thickness of the shielding sheet is fixed, the linear attenuation coefficient, which is a function of the radiation energy, can be calculated using Equation (1). In a shielding sheet with a constant thickness, medical radiation energy is inversely proportional to the shielding efficiency, and the higher the intensity of the incident energy, the lower the shielding efficiency [27]. As a result, the greater the interaction due to the dispersion of oyster shell powder particles in the shielding sheet, the greater the shielding efficiency owing to the attenuation of the radiation energy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%