2014
DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2014.955523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of wrist and forearm motion in college-aged baseball pitchers

Abstract: Current pitching literature focuses primarily on the elbow and glenohumeral joints. This has led to a paucity of information regarding the forearm and wrist, and the limited data available are inconsistent. Therefore, this article seeks to provide a comprehensive description of the kinematics and kinetics of the wrist and forearm for the fastball, curveball, slider/cutter, and change-up for college-level baseball pitchers. Thirty-six collegiate pitchers were evaluated using motion analysis techniques. Results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, peak ulnar angular velocity, the velocity at which the pitcher's wrist deviates towards the ulnar side, was significantly slower in the left-handed pitchers. This may be of significance for both pitching coaches and biomechanical analyses, as the wrists' motion provides most of the control for producing the movement of the ball (Solomito, Garibay, Woods, Õunpuu, & Nissen, 2014). It is also important to note that there are large standard deviations in the results for the wrist parameters could be caused by inter-pitcher variability indicating differences in pitching techniques as previously described in the literature (Solomito et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, peak ulnar angular velocity, the velocity at which the pitcher's wrist deviates towards the ulnar side, was significantly slower in the left-handed pitchers. This may be of significance for both pitching coaches and biomechanical analyses, as the wrists' motion provides most of the control for producing the movement of the ball (Solomito, Garibay, Woods, Õunpuu, & Nissen, 2014). It is also important to note that there are large standard deviations in the results for the wrist parameters could be caused by inter-pitcher variability indicating differences in pitching techniques as previously described in the literature (Solomito et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The pronation angle on the fastball pitch and change-up during the acceleration phase was greater than that for curveballs, but the movement pattern of pronation/supination was similar among the various pitches (Barrentine et al, 1998;Nissen et al, 2009;Sakurai et al, 1993;Solomito et al, 2014). Thus, a supination phase around the instant of BRL during the various pitches is expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The pronation/supination curve calculated using the FC-MIR normalisation technique (the second column in Figure 4) was different from those calculated using the other two methods. The curve made using the FC-MIR normalisation technique was quite similar to those reported in previous studies (Nissen et al, 2007(Nissen et al, , 2009Sakurai et al, 1993;Solomito et al, 2014). Since the supination lasted for a short period, and the subsequent pronation had greater angular velocity, fluctuations of the timing of the supination phase in FC-MIR normalisation data might superficially result in a diminished range of motion of supination in the averaged data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations