1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00517138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of vasogenic edema in experimental brain tumors by cathodoluminescence and fluorescence microscopy

Abstract: Cathodoluminescence and fluorescence microscopy have been used to study vasogenic edema in experimentally induced brain tumors in rats. Both methods are suited for the demonstration of FITC- or TRITC-coupled antiserum, and thus allow the evaluation of serum protein extravasation. Cathodoluminescence is more time consuming and laborious than fluorescence microscopy, but it has distinct advantages: Contrast enhancement improves the differentiation between certain cell types, and the higher resolution of the scan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With AA, the reason for the variable density was not apparent by histological examination. It is possible that the low density is related to increased intra and extracellufar water content of the tumor, a parameter not measured in this study (54,55).…”
Section: Comparison Of Ct Finding With Human Brain Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…With AA, the reason for the variable density was not apparent by histological examination. It is possible that the low density is related to increased intra and extracellufar water content of the tumor, a parameter not measured in this study (54,55).…”
Section: Comparison Of Ct Finding With Human Brain Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Future investigations will aim to identify these substances emitting CL. There have been several reports of the identification of organic substances based on CL wavelength [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CL is essentially a similar phenomenon to conventional fluorescence elicited under ultraviolet light, it has some intrinsic advantages over the latter (Bröcker and Pfefferkorn, 1979;Pfefferkorn et al, 1980): (1) CL can be amplified electronically and measured quantitatively; (2) the depth of focus and the resolution in the CL mode is much higher than in the conventional fluorescence microscope; and (3) some substances exhibit luminescence only under electron irradiation. Although many attempts (Basu, 1983;Bond et al, 1974;Boyde and Reid, 1983;Bröcker and Pfefferkorn, 1979;Cavellier and Berry, 1985;Cavellier et al, 1978;De Mets, 1974;De Mets and Lagasse, 1971;Herbst and Hoder, 1978;Hörl, 1972Hörl, , 1978Hurter et al, 1981;Pearce and Hays, 1966;Schmidt et al, 1975;Soni et al, 1975) were made to utilize CL in biology, its applications have been limited because CL from organic chemicals is a very weak signal and easily fades under high beam current (De Mets and Lagasse, 1971).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%