2007
DOI: 10.1080/10789669.2007.10391460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Various Turbulence Models in Predicting Airflow and Turbulence in Enclosed Environments by CFD: Part 2—Comparison with Experimental Data from Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
250
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 563 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
250
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The model was selected because it has been successfully used to simulate airflow and contaminant transport in various enclosed environment [10][11]. The corresponding governing transport equations for the RNG k-ε turbulence model can be generalized as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was selected because it has been successfully used to simulate airflow and contaminant transport in various enclosed environment [10][11]. The corresponding governing transport equations for the RNG k-ε turbulence model can be generalized as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present analysis, k -ε turbulent model in the RNG form is adopted, because it was broadly validated by other authors in different enclosed environments [13,16,[18][19][20] and, moreover, for the case analyzed in the present paper, to the best of our knowledge, experimental data, to validate the model, do not exist.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the investigated type of flow problem this is not the case. Zhang et al (2007) show that the performance of specific turbulence models can depend on the type of flow problem for which it is applied. Following the comparison, the standard k-ε model was chosen as turbulence model for the further evaluations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%