2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of various phenotypic methods for differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study highlights that around 92.79% of positivity were seen with YEPD ( Yeast Extract Peptone Dextrose) which correlates with a study conducted by KIM et al, 18 where demonstration of Germ tubes were seen within 30 minutes in YEPD at 39 0 C but after 60 min in serum at 37 0 C. Whereas study conducted by Bhumla et al, 19 showed 81.25% production of germ tube production with YEPD and another study carried out by Abiroo Jan et al, 20 showed 89.30% germ tube production but only in Candida albicans and no germ tube formation in candida dubliniensis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Our study highlights that around 92.79% of positivity were seen with YEPD ( Yeast Extract Peptone Dextrose) which correlates with a study conducted by KIM et al, 18 where demonstration of Germ tubes were seen within 30 minutes in YEPD at 39 0 C but after 60 min in serum at 37 0 C. Whereas study conducted by Bhumla et al, 19 showed 81.25% production of germ tube production with YEPD and another study carried out by Abiroo Jan et al, 20 showed 89.30% germ tube production but only in Candida albicans and no germ tube formation in candida dubliniensis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, these methods are not accessible everywhere. A recent study corroborated that colony color on HiCrome candida differential agar after 72 h of incubation or growth on xylose-based agar medium after 48 h incubation is an easy, accurate, and cost-effective method of differentiating C. dubliniensis from C. albicans [ 22 ]. A mass spectrometry identification approach of C. dubliniensis appears reliable [ 23 , 24 ]; however, more database reviews are warranted [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(23) A pesar de contar con una especificidad del 100 %, la prueba de Tubo Germinal muestra una sensibilidad del 87,1 %, lo que sugiere una capacidad moderada para detectar la presencia de células fúngicas en muestras en general. (26) Sin embargo, su atractivo radica en su costo accesible en comparación con los métodos fenotípicos y PCR, cuyos costos por aislamiento resultan considerablemente elevados; en contraste, la prueba de Tubo Germinal se destaca por su costo relativamente insignificante (41) , lo que la convierte en una opción frecuentemente utilizada.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified