2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.08.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of various chemical extraction methods to estimate plant-available arsenic in mine soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After 4 h agitation, the mix was centrifuged (1.7 × 1000 G) and filtered. The extract was acidified to pH < 2 [45]. The determinations were carried out by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES).…”
Section: Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 4 h agitation, the mix was centrifuged (1.7 × 1000 G) and filtered. The extract was acidified to pH < 2 [45]. The determinations were carried out by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES).…”
Section: Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b). Based on the relative abundance of the fraction d 3 it was 253 used all other experiments. Another argument for decreased As dissolution with decreasing 254 particle size in air-homogenised experiments is the fact that the more reactive fractions might 255 have readily oxidized from As -I /As 0 which precipitate on the surface of the material and 256 inhibit As -I /As 0 solubilization.…”
Section: Arsenic Release Experiments 151mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After equilibration, 1.0 ml of the supernatant solution was retrieved at 158 the top of each tube for As analysis. To compare the leaching capacity of the tested waters 159 some experiments were conducted with 0.1 M EDTA, H 2 SO 4, and Na 2 CO 3 . 160…”
Section: Arsenic Release Experiments 151mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations