2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-018-0217-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of urban topography–biotope–population density relations for Istanbul–Beşiktaş urban landscape using AHP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AHP is essentially based on logical and numerical consistency for establishing hierarchies and determining superiorities (Saaty & Vargas, 2001 ; Wind & Saaty, 1980 ). AHP functions with a hierarchy that can combine both subjective and objective criteria (Aksu & Küçük, 2020 ; Fiore et al, 2020 ; Saaty, 1980 ). It is a powerful and comprehensive methodology designed to facilitate sound decision-making for the decision-maker utilizing both the empirical data and subjective decisions (Escobar et al, 2004 ; Sólnes, 2003 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AHP is essentially based on logical and numerical consistency for establishing hierarchies and determining superiorities (Saaty & Vargas, 2001 ; Wind & Saaty, 1980 ). AHP functions with a hierarchy that can combine both subjective and objective criteria (Aksu & Küçük, 2020 ; Fiore et al, 2020 ; Saaty, 1980 ). It is a powerful and comprehensive methodology designed to facilitate sound decision-making for the decision-maker utilizing both the empirical data and subjective decisions (Escobar et al, 2004 ; Sólnes, 2003 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scholarship associated SWOT and AHP to overcome the problems in decision-making methods in AHP processes with additional applications to AHP approaches and provide choices according to the application areas, as hybrid studies are also developed. Some of these are hybrid SWOT-ANP-FANP (Arsić et al, 2017 ); A'WOT hybrid method (Kişi, 2019 ); SWOT-AHP hybrid approach (Najafinasab et al, 2020 ); SWOT and F-AHP (Kramar et al, 2019 ); AHP-Fuzzy and TOPSIS models (Alipouri et al, 2020 ); SWOT-Fuzzy AHP approach (Wang et al, 2020 ); ANP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS-SWOT (Ervural et al, 2018 ); SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS (Solangi et al, 2019 ); fuzzy axiomatic design approach (Feng, 2020 ); Fuzzy-AHP-VIKOR(Awasthi et al, 2018 ); Fuzzy-AHP (Calabrese et al, 2019 ); Fuzzy-AHP and SWOT (Tavana et al, 2016 ); SWOT-Fuzzy, TOPSIS with AHP (Bas, 2013 ); AHP-ELECTRE (Borajee & Yakchali, 2011 ); SWOT-Fuzzy COPRAS (Hatefi, 2018 ); Fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS (Ocampo, 2019 ); Fuzzy-AHP–TOPSIS(Aksu & Küçük, 2020 ); Fuzzy DEMATEL MCDA (Yıldızbaşı et al, 2020 ); and MCDA-AHP-TOPSIS-VIKOR (Kaymaz et al, 2020 ) as hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach literature keeps developing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploring how to effectively integrate the traditional Depthmap-based spatial syntax analysis techniques with the big data mining that has emerged in recent years to enhance the explanatory power of complex urban spatial problems, this research direction will become one of the frontier branches of research in the field of urban planning. erefore, in [8], the combined application research of spatial syntax and big data provides new possibilities for the spatial morphology research of the characteristic town to better solve the construction problems of the characteristic town [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches to integrate different KPIs are traditionally undertaken via Multi--Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) (Li et al, 2020;Rodríguez-Espinosa, Aguilera--Benavente, & Gómez-Delgado, 2020), Analytical Hierarchy Processes (AHP) (Aksu & Küçük, 2020;Bivina & Parida, 2019) and optimization routines of different types (Eicker, Weiler, Schumacher, & Braun, 2020;Jia, Li, & Liu, 2020). These methods are highly deterministic as they constrain problem framing to the setting of weighting systems or predefine ranges of acceptable solutions without transparency and real control in the rationale behind different parametric design combinations.…”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%