2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3300-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of two DNA extraction methods for the PCR-based detection of eukaryotic enteric pathogens in fecal samples

Abstract: ObjectiveEfficient and easy-to-use DNA extraction and purification methods are critical in implementing PCR-based diagnosis of pathogens. In order to optimize the routine clinical laboratory diagnosis of eukaryotic enteric pathogens, we compare, via quantitative PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values, the efficiency of two DNA extraction kits: the semi-automated EZ1® (Qiagen) and the manual QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen), on six protozoa: Blastocystis spp., Cryptosporidium parvum/hominis, Cyclospora cayetanensis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The automated procedure using the EZ1 Advanced XL (Qiagen, Hilden, German) with the DNA Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's recommendation [8]. The RNA were extracted from 200 μL clear supernatant using the EZ1 Advanced XL (Qiagen, Hilden, German) with the Virus Mini Kit v2.0 (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's recommendation.…”
Section: Gastrointestinal Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automated procedure using the EZ1 Advanced XL (Qiagen, Hilden, German) with the DNA Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's recommendation [8]. The RNA were extracted from 200 μL clear supernatant using the EZ1 Advanced XL (Qiagen, Hilden, German) with the Virus Mini Kit v2.0 (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's recommendation.…”
Section: Gastrointestinal Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total stool DNA was extracted with the EZ1 DNA tissue kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the procedure described herein [28]. Briefly, 200 mg (200 µL if liquid stools) and 350 µL of G2 lysis buffer were added in a 1.5 mL tube containing 200 mg of 2 mm glass powder.…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer time of fixation may impact the diagnostic accuracy, but this has not been investigated in the present study. Lysis and extraction of DNA are important and can influence the results [39,40,54]. However, the method in this study showed no statistically significant difference in reproducibility between fixed and unpreserved samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The most common gastrointestinal parasites included in NAbased diagnostics in Sweden are E. histolytica, G. intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp. Different cell lysis methods have been used prior to protozoan DNA extraction to minimize inhibitors of the PCR process [32,33] and to disrupt robust cell walls [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. A reduced yield of parasite-DNA has been reported from fixed samples [41,42].…”
Section: Introduction/backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%