2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of three commercial ELISA tests for serological detection of maedi-visna virus using Bayesian latent class analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of genetic sequences of SRLVs is important not only for evaluating the spread of SRLV types and subtypes, but also for monitoring antigenic variation. It is known that antigenic variation can be responsible for the misdiagnosis of highly divergent subtypes, since no test is capable of detecting all circulating strains of SRLVs [11,[44][45][46][47][48][49]. ELISA tests usually use the capsid protein as the antigen, so analysis of the epitope sequence of the gag-encoded protein is crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of genetic sequences of SRLVs is important not only for evaluating the spread of SRLV types and subtypes, but also for monitoring antigenic variation. It is known that antigenic variation can be responsible for the misdiagnosis of highly divergent subtypes, since no test is capable of detecting all circulating strains of SRLVs [11,[44][45][46][47][48][49]. ELISA tests usually use the capsid protein as the antigen, so analysis of the epitope sequence of the gag-encoded protein is crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificity of monostrain ELISAs is usually high, but the sensitivity is extremely variable. Differences in the sensitivity of ELISA tests lead to contradictory results from these tests ( 2 , 4 , 24 , 36 , 76 , 99 , 161 ). The CAEV/MVV Total Ab test (IDEXX Switzerland AG, Liebefeld-Bern, Switzerland) has sensitivity of 98.6% and a specificity of 99.3%; however, this test could not detect animals infected with A4 strains, which reveals some limitations ( 27 ).…”
Section: Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the aSe and aSp, a preliminary cut-off value was defined for each antigen from the samples in panel 5 by defining samples as positive or negative based on ELISA results. The estimated diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, as well as the predictive values for the definition of ELISA-positive and negative samples when evaluated in the Norwegian sheep population, are described in Jerre et al [36]. Although misclassification of samples might have occurred, no perfect reference test to detect MVV infection exists; thus, misclassifications would have been possible if other tests had been used as well [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although misclassification of samples might have occurred, no perfect reference test to detect MVV infection exists; thus, misclassifications would have been possible if other tests had been used as well [5]. The screening and verification of ELISA includes a mix of peptides from TM, SU and p25 antigens and TM and p28 antigens, respectively [28,36]. We regarded an ELISA-positive sample as positive towards all antigens in the multiplex assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%