2008
DOI: 10.1186/1476-069x-7-24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Webler-Brown model for estimating tetrachloroethylene exposure from vinyl-lined asbestos-cement pipes

Abstract: Background: From May 1968 through March 1980, vinyl-lined asbestos-cement (VL/AC) water distribution pipes were installed in New England to avoid taste and odor problems associated with asbestos-cement pipes. The vinyl resin was applied to the inner pipe surface in a solution of tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene, PCE). Substantial amounts of PCE remained in the liner and subsequently leached into public drinking water supplies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, results from two validation studies indicate good correlation between PCE concentrations in historical water samples and exposure estimates based on the original Webler-Brown flow algorithm (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.48, p<0.0001) (Spence et al 2008), as well as exposure estimates based on the EPANET water distribution system modeling software (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.65, P<0.001) (Gallagher et al unpublished manuscript). While these validation study results suggest the magnitude of exposure misclassification is relatively small, particularly given the quartile exposure categories used in the current analysis, it likely hampered our ability to detect a modest increase in the risk of pregnancy loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, results from two validation studies indicate good correlation between PCE concentrations in historical water samples and exposure estimates based on the original Webler-Brown flow algorithm (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.48, p<0.0001) (Spence et al 2008), as well as exposure estimates based on the EPANET water distribution system modeling software (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.65, P<0.001) (Gallagher et al unpublished manuscript). While these validation study results suggest the magnitude of exposure misclassification is relatively small, particularly given the quartile exposure categories used in the current analysis, it likely hampered our ability to detect a modest increase in the risk of pregnancy loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses were conducted to account for non-independent outcomes arising from several children born to the same woman [23,24]. Eighty-eight percent of the mothers had two or more children during the study period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the exposure assessment predicted the annual mass of PCE delivered to each subject’s residence during gestation and early childhood. Despite the concern for exposure misclassification, validation studies indicate reasonable correlation between our exposure estimates and PCE concentrations in historical water samples [44]. Though unmeasured confounding is a concern, the current and previous studies from this cohort noted little or no confounding because of the irregular pattern of contamination [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%