2010
DOI: 10.1118/1.3310381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the spatial dependence of the point spread function in 2D PET image reconstruction using LOR‐OSEM

Abstract: PET image reconstruction using a SM made from an accurately characterized PSF that accounts for r and d dependencies results in improved spatial resolution and contrast-noise relations, which may aid in lesion boundary detection for treatment planning or quantitative assessment of treatment response.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This happens because of the increased incidence angles at the crystal faces [14]. Consequently, the PSF's size and form change along the radial or axial directions [3], [6], [15].…”
Section: Results: Scanner-related Influencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This happens because of the increased incidence angles at the crystal faces [14]. Consequently, the PSF's size and form change along the radial or axial directions [3], [6], [15].…”
Section: Results: Scanner-related Influencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Baseline 18 F-FDG uptake in tumor-bearing mice was determined before and after 1A12 treatment. The percentage mean ID/g tissue of 18 F-FDG uptake was calculated using the OSEM2D method upon normalization of injected dose (43), and the percentage change at day 2 relative to day 0 was determined for each tumor site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting operation, referred to as kernel superposition (KS), variable kernel convolution, or convolution using a spatially-varying point spread function, appears in many different fields. Examples include radiotherapy dose calculation, both using photons [1] and charged particles [13], ultrasound imaging [19], computed tomography [16,14], positron emission tomography [28], photography [5,15], astronomy [6,2], and microscopy [23]. …”
Section: Kernel Superposition Vs Convolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%