2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2040350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the shape of the specular peak for high glossy surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Achieving such a resolution is of course a way to see what the human eye, with its typical resolution of 1 ′ ~0.017°, perceives. It also reveals other effects not perceived visually, namely strong intensity fluctuations superimposed within the specular peak of the BRDF [4,6]. The question we address in this article is the nature of these fluctuations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Achieving such a resolution is of course a way to see what the human eye, with its typical resolution of 1 ′ ~0.017°, perceives. It also reveals other effects not perceived visually, namely strong intensity fluctuations superimposed within the specular peak of the BRDF [4,6]. The question we address in this article is the nature of these fluctuations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Camera with fisheye On adjustable holder Traditional BRDF measurement technology is becoming increasingly sophisticated. At present, it is known that the BRDF measurement device with the best angular resolution is the Condor device proposed by LNE-CNAM in 2015, with an angular resolution of 0.022° [56][57][58]. The SOC series BRDF test device developed by US SOC (Surface Optics Corporation) is one of the typical commercial device that has achieved the establishment of a large BRDF database [59].…”
Section: Sample Holder With Precision Screws Plate Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It corresponds to a balance between avoiding over-filtering effects due to low number of cells, and noisy representation in reconstructed signal due to too small cells (Figure 6). As a comparison, the EZ-Contrast from Eldim [41] has an angular resolution of 0.4 • and the ConDOR facility (Conoscopic Device for Optic Reflectometry) [42] developed by the LNE-CNAM has an angular resolution of 0.018 • (this is one of the most precise existing device). The latter is dedicated to study the shape of a 1 • width specular peak that does not correspond to our level of surface roughness study.…”
Section: A Virtual Goniophotometermentioning
confidence: 99%