2019
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.13982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a new hemostatic powder using a quantitative surface bleeding severity scale

Abstract: Aims of the study The safety and efficacy of a hemostatic powder (HP) versus a control agent, absorbable gelatin sponge and thrombin (G + T), were assessed, using a validated, quantitative bleeding severity scale. Methods Subjects were randomized to receive HP (256 subjects) or G + T (132 subjects) for treatment of minimal, mild, or moderate bleeding at 20 investigational sites. The primary efficacy endpoint was non‐inferiority of HP relative to G + T for success at achieving hemostasis within 6 minutes. Secon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[29,30] The SPOT GRADE (SG) is a clinically validated surface bleeding severity scale (SBSS) that was developed for the quantitative assessment of target bleeding site (TBS) blood loss ( Figure 1) and meets regulatory agency requirements for use. [31,32,33] In addition to providing a consistent and reliable method for evaluating hemostatic agent performance, another potential bene t of the SG scale in surgery is to serve as an indicator of severity and volume of blood loss prior to systemic blood pressure changes and reductions in hematocrit. Having a consistent, uniform scale for bleeding severity may allow further de nition and delineation of appropriate actions to minimize intraoperative bleeding at each level of severity and help avoid the need for transfusion of blood products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[29,30] The SPOT GRADE (SG) is a clinically validated surface bleeding severity scale (SBSS) that was developed for the quantitative assessment of target bleeding site (TBS) blood loss ( Figure 1) and meets regulatory agency requirements for use. [31,32,33] In addition to providing a consistent and reliable method for evaluating hemostatic agent performance, another potential bene t of the SG scale in surgery is to serve as an indicator of severity and volume of blood loss prior to systemic blood pressure changes and reductions in hematocrit. Having a consistent, uniform scale for bleeding severity may allow further de nition and delineation of appropriate actions to minimize intraoperative bleeding at each level of severity and help avoid the need for transfusion of blood products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SG scale has been previously described based on an in vitro model of surface bleeding severity. [31] The current study was executed to validate the use of the SG scale in a clinical setting to support employment of the scale in large multicenter randomized trials [33] as well as to provide an initial evaluation for the safety and e cacy of a local hemostat, HEMOBLAST Bellows (HB).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powder‐based hemostatic agents offer the advantage of the ease of use and can cover broad surgical fields or small areas without the need for additional applicators or pressurized gases. These agents are easy to dispense to the surgeon in a matter of seconds and do not require refrigeration or mixing . From a clinical application prospective, we have used the product in over 60 open cardiothoracic and vascular procedures since late 2018.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These agents are easy to dispense to the surgeon in a matter of seconds and do not require refrigeration or mixing. 6 From a clinical application prospective, we have used the product in over 60 open cardiothoracic and vascular procedures since late 2018. Improvements in the field of hemostasis have been noted in the majority of these high-risk patients prone to bleeding (ie, cardiac surgery revisions, LVAD patients, patients on platelet inhibitors, etc.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation