1969
DOI: 10.3109/17453676908989526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Reliability of Radiological Methods for Registration of Scoliosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the conditions of measurement and statistical methods used, the measurement precision of Cobb's angle with a 95% confidence interval varies between 2.8°and 10°according to recent intraobserver and interobserver studies. 22,24,32,35 Cobb's angle measurement variations are greater in severe scoliosis. 22,35 In the present study, the reproducibility of Cobb's angle was very good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending on the conditions of measurement and statistical methods used, the measurement precision of Cobb's angle with a 95% confidence interval varies between 2.8°and 10°according to recent intraobserver and interobserver studies. 22,24,32,35 Cobb's angle measurement variations are greater in severe scoliosis. 22,35 In the present study, the reproducibility of Cobb's angle was very good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…22,24,32,35 Cobb's angle measurement variations are greater in severe scoliosis. 22,35 In the present study, the reproducibility of Cobb's angle was very good. However, moderately scoliotic patients were involved in this series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…0.48 degrees in curves of the magnitude reported in this study (Sevastikoglou & Bergqvist 1969). The measurement error is not believed to be systematic and is accounted for in the statistical analysis.…”
Section: Merhodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…O erro intraobservador variou entre ± 2 a ±4 graus. Já a ausência dos valores intra-observador foi apontada como uma limitação em estudos com metodologia similar 15,17 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified