“…The results of the test sites compare favorably with earlier studies of Hanna R et al, (2004) [28] and [22] whereas the results at control sites where in accordance to the studies of Drizhal et al, (2010) [37] and Sukumar et al, (2011) [38]. Comparison between the two groups revealed no statistically significant difference in the reduction of clinical attachment level when measured at different points of time during the study, in contrast to the study of [22] and Saini et al, (2011) [35] where a statistically significant gain in clinical attachment was reported with PRP in combination with other alloplastic materials, when compared to bone grafts alone [12]. The gain in the clinical attachment level has been thought to represent resolution of tissue inflammation, reformation of collagen fibers, new attachment to the root surface and the bone fill [39].…”