2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the relationship between [18F]FDG and P-glycoprotein expression: an experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1). This time-dependent shift was also found in cancer cells (17,25). Interestingly, CsA was previously shown to abolish the difference in 18 F-FDG uptake between MDRpositive and MDR-negative cell lines (23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). This time-dependent shift was also found in cancer cells (17,25). Interestingly, CsA was previously shown to abolish the difference in 18 F-FDG uptake between MDRpositive and MDR-negative cell lines (23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Numerous in vitro studies, performed using different cancer cell lines, have revealed that MDR or P-gp-overexpressing cells incorporate 18 F-FDG at lower levels (14,15). This inverse relationship between P-gp function and 18 F-FDG uptake was also reported in vivo with selected cancer cells implanted as xenografts: P-gp-overexpressing tumors showed reduced 18 F-FDG uptake (16,17), which was restored using pharmacological P-gp inhibition (17). In patients, an inverse relationship was found between 18 F-FDG uptake and the level of P-gp expression examined in tumor resection (lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) (18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Several authors reported strong positive correlation between the GLUT transporter expression, the 18 FDG uptake and the malignancy of tumors, while others found only weak correlations (Lorke et al, 2001;Zhao et al, 2005;Smith et al, 2007;Vallabhajosula, 2007;Ong et al, 2008;Paudyal et al, 2008;Seo et al, 2009;Smith, 2010;). Zaho et al (2005) and Yu et al (2012) demonstrated that the intratumoral 18 FDG distribution correlates well with the expression levels of GLUT-1, GLUT-3, and Hexokinase-II. In line with the above Southworth et al (2003) suggested tissue specific differences in the phosphorylation rate of 18 FDG to 18 FDG -6-phosphate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A number of them accounted decreased accumulation of 18 FDG in cancer cells and tumors expressing Pgp at high level (Lorke et al, 2001;Higashi et al, 2004;Yamada et al, 2005;Seo et al, 2009;Smith, 2010, Yu et al, 2012. The most obvious interpretation of this observation would be that 18 FDG is a substrate of Pgp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation