2005
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/42/1/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the primary frequency standard NPL-CsF1

Abstract: A new caesium fountain frequency standard (NPL-CsF1) at the National Physical Laboratory is described. Procedures for evaluation of the systematic frequency shifts are presented. The NPL-CsF1 has a short-term stability σ y (τ ) = 1.4 × 10 −13 τ −1/2 , predominantly due to the local oscillator phase noise. The accuracy of 1 part in 10 15 is limited by the uncertainty of the frequency shift due to collisions between cold atoms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This treatment is similar to that reported in [5]. In contrast, we do not use the uncertainty of the axis intercept to estimate uncertainty due to nonlinearity, because the slope is important for estimation of the collisional shift while the vertical displacement of the fitted line is not.…”
Section: B Collisional Shiftmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This treatment is similar to that reported in [5]. In contrast, we do not use the uncertainty of the axis intercept to estimate uncertainty due to nonlinearity, because the slope is important for estimation of the collisional shift while the vertical displacement of the fitted line is not.…”
Section: B Collisional Shiftmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Based on the method described in [5], the second-order Zeeman shift averaged over the interrogation time is estimated. At first, the OP is turned OFF, and the atoms in m F = +1 are prepared by adjusting the frequency of the microwave signal in the state-selection cavity.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Frequency Corrections A Second-order Zmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, fountains realize the second with a relative accuracy ranging from 3×10 -16 to 10×10 -16 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and, in the last ten years, allowed the uncertainty of the Atomic International Timescale (TAI) unit to be reduced from 1×10 -14 to 5×10 -16 . Since 2003, INRIM operates the Cs fountain ITCs-F1 and evaluates on a regular basis the TAI unit with a type B uncertainty of 5×10 -16 and an overall uncertainty less than 1×10 -15 [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The setups, already described in detail earlier [17,18] operate in cyclic modes: 10 7 -10 8 Cs atoms from a room temperature vapor are collected and cooled in a MOT. The atoms are then launched in moving optical molasses and further cooled.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%