2022
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01250-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Panbio COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Test in Subjects Infected with Omicron Using Different Specimens

Abstract: This study showed that the antigen rapid test for COVID19 worked fine using nasal swabs when it was utilized in patients infected with the Omicron variant, showing a concordance with PCR in 93% of patients tested. The nasal swab yielded more reliable results than the oral swab when an antigen rapid diagnosis test (the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid diagnostic test) was used in patients infected with the Omicron variant.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we confirmed the Omicron (BA.1/BA.1.1) lineage in all samples eligible for genome sequencing. In line with our findings, recent studies reported no impact of Omicron on the limit of detection (LOD) ( 2 , 11 ) and the clinical performance ( 6 , 12 ) in other RAT models. Of interest, while BA.2 carries the same mutations in the nucleocapsid as the BA.1, further studies will be required to evaluate the BA.4 and BA.5 lineages, as they acquired the nucleocapsid S413R mutation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Here, we confirmed the Omicron (BA.1/BA.1.1) lineage in all samples eligible for genome sequencing. In line with our findings, recent studies reported no impact of Omicron on the limit of detection (LOD) ( 2 , 11 ) and the clinical performance ( 6 , 12 ) in other RAT models. Of interest, while BA.2 carries the same mutations in the nucleocapsid as the BA.1, further studies will be required to evaluate the BA.4 and BA.5 lineages, as they acquired the nucleocapsid S413R mutation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Most published studies evaluated RAT performance with different SARS-CoV-2 variants (including Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron) using different specimens from different countries ( Galliez et al, 2022 ; Kyritsi et al, 2022 ; Hardick et al, 2022 ; Weishampel et al, 2022 ). Sporadic worldwide studies compared NAATs and RATs during the Omicron surge ( Schrom et al, 2022 ; Lin et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study was performed during high-transmission waves when the delta and omicron variants were predominant in Mozambique. Test manufactures have reported that emerging variants do not influence the performance of Ag-RDTs, because these detect nucleocapsid virus proteins while genetic variation of SARS-CoV-2 is mainly concentrated on the S gene [ 28 ]. Nevertheless, it has also been described that mutations affecting the spike protein can interfere with the binding of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test manufactures have reported that emerging variants do not influence the performance of Ag-RDTs, because these detect nucleocapsid virus proteins while genetic variation of SARS-CoV-2 is mainly concentrated on the S gene [ 28 ]. Nevertheless, it has also been described that mutations affecting the spike protein can interfere with the binding of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies [ 28 ]. Although with no statistical significance, a study conducted by Bayart et al (2022) found differences in Ag-RDTs sensitivity for delta and omicron variants, with sensitivity varying from 70.0 to 92.9% for delta and from 69.9 to 78.8% for omicron variant [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%