Evaluation of the life quality in patients with Temporomandibular Disorders

Lima, Carolina Oliveira de; Miranda, Jean Soares; Caetano, Paula Liparini; Malta, Natália Veloso; Leite, Isabel Cristina Gonçalves; Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira

doi:10.14295/bds.2015.v18i3.1144

Cited by 6 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In relation to the study design, 32 were cross-sectional studies, 2 were cohort studies and there were 6 case and control studies. With regard to the classification of studies included according to age group, 24 studies were performed in children [ 16 – 19 , 25 , 27 , 29 – 37 , 39 , 40 , 43 , 45 , 47 , 51 , 52 , 54 , 55 ], 10 were in adolescents [ 20 , 22 – 24 , 26 , 28 , 44 , 46 , 48 , 50 ], 4 were adult studies [ 21 , 38 , 42 , 53 ] and 2 study included more than one age group [ 41 , 49 ]. They all also evaluated the impact of oral disease over OHRQoL, classified according to exposure to one or more oral diseases, tooth decay, malocclusion, TDI, periodontal diseases, temporomandibular dysfunction, salivary gland pathologies, cleft lip and palate, and edentulism and found studies related to dental caries (n = 7) [ 20 , 25 , 32 , 36 , 37 , 43 , 54 ], malocclusion (n = 2) [ 24 , 26 ], TDI (n = 3) [ 29 , 39 , 44 ], periodontal disease (n = 1) [ 38 ], cleft lip and palate (n = 1) [ 40 ], temporomandibular dysfunction (n = 1) [ 41 ], edentulism (n = 1) […”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The quality of life measurement instruments used in the different studies were as follows; CPQ8-10 [ 27 , 31 , 35 , 36 , 40 , 47 , 49 ], CPQ11-14 [ 20 , 22 – 24 , 26 , 28 , 48 – 50 ], ECOHIS [ 16 , 29 , 33 , 37 , 45 , 52 , 54 ], B-ECOHIS [ 18 , 19 , 25 , 30 , 32 , 39 , 43 , 51 ],OHIP-14 [ 21 , 42 , 46 , 53 ],OHIP [ 38 , 41 ],C-ECOHIS [ 55 ], SOHO-5 [ 17 ], B-SOHO-5 [ 34 ] and Child-OIDP [ 44 ], the most frequent being CPQ11-14(n-9), B-ECOHIS(n-8). The association between quality of life and oral diseases was expressed using RR, OR and PR and mean difference hypothesis tests and beta coefficients.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only one study [ 41 ] evaluated the association between temporomandibular dysfunction and OHRQoL ( Table 1 ) measured with the OHIP-14 instrument in Brazil in people from 16 to 80 years of age. Three types of temporomandibular dysfunction were recorded: muscle disorder, jaw displacement and arthralgia, and arthritis and osteoarthritis.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With regard to the evaluation of the quality of the studies, eight were of good quality [ 20 , 21 , 26 , 31 – 33 , 49 , 53 ], 22 were of intermediate quality [ 16 – 19 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 27 – 29 , 34 , 35 , 37 , 42 , 43 , 45 , 47 , 48 , 50 , 51 , 54 , 55 ] and ten were of poor quality [ 24 , 30 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 44 , 46 , 52 ] ( Table 3 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Impact of oral diseases on oral health-related quality of life: A systematic review of studies conducted in Latin America and the Caribbean

Yactayo-Alburquerque

Alen-Méndez

Azañedo³

et al. 2021

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background We performed a systematic review of studies conducted in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) to assess the impact of oral diseases on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Materials and methods Searches were performed of the following PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and LILACS databases. Randomized clinical trials, quasi-experimental studies, cohort studies, case and control studies, and cross-sectional studies which included at least 100 participants evaluating the impact of oral diseases on OHRQoL were included. PROSPERO registry number: CRD42020156098. Results After exclusion of duplicates, 3310 articles were identified, 40 of which were included in this review. 90% of the studies were conducted in Brazil. The most commonly used OHRQoL measuring instruments were CPQ 11–14 (n = 9), ECOHIS (n-8) and B-ECOHIS (n = 8). The study designs included 32 cross-sectional, 2 cohort and 6 case and control studies. Most of the studies were conducted in children (n = 25) and adolescents (n = 9). Most studies identified an impact on OHRQoL in children, adolescents and adults with oral diseases. Moreover, greater oral disease severity had a greater impact on OHRQoL. Conclusions Most studies in LAC report a negative impact of diseases on OHRQoL. More longitudinal studies are required to confirm the results of these studies.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Impact of oral diseases on oral health-related quality of life: A systematic review of studies conducted in Latin America and the Caribbean

Yactayo-Alburquerque

Alen-Méndez

Azañedo³

et al. 2021

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 12 13 The changes caused by TMD, especially pain, can interfere with the quality of life of these patients. 14 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Photomodulation in the treatment of chronic pain in patients with temporomandibular disorder: protocol for cost-effectiveness analysis

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionEpidemiological data show that the signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) start becoming apparent from 6 years of age, and during adolescence these signs and symptoms are similar to those of adults. The present study aims to estimate the direct costs for treatment of chronic muscle pain with photobiomodulation therapy, occlusal splint and placebo in patients with TMD; to evaluate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy and occlusal splint for treatment of muscle pain in patients with TMD; to analyse the cost-effectiveness of the two proposed treatments for pain; and to describe and compare the results of the analyses of these treatments.Methods and analysisThis is a prospective trial of clinical and economic analyses that will include 135 patientswith TMD aged between 15 years and 25 years, randomly assigned to a treatment group: G1 (photobiomodulation), G2 (occlusal splint) and G3 (placebo). The analyses will be based on the cost of each treatment during the 12-month period. The outcome of the analysis of effectiveness will be pain, measured periodically by means of clinical examination of Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. The cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated using, as end points, pain and the ratio of the differences in costs between the groups studied. The evaluation of the impact of the treatment on quality of life will be determined by applying the adapted EuroQol-5D.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol has been ethically approved by the local medical ethical committee, protocol number 2.014.339. Results will be submitted to international peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.Trial registration numberNCT03096301.

show abstract

The impact of oro‐facial pain conditions on oral health‐related quality of life: A systematic review

Oghli

List

et al. 2020

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pain in the oro‐facial region is one of the most common reasons for patients to seek dental treatment. Oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) can be affected not only by pain, but also by other oral disorders. Four main dimensions, Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance and Psychosocial Impact, have been suggested to cover different areas of OHRQoL. The aim of this systematic review was to map the impact of oro‐facial pain conditions on the Orofacial Pain dimension of OHRQoL (PROSPERO registration: CRD42017064033). Studies were included if they reported Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) mean or median domain scores for patients with odontogenic pain, oral mucosal pain/burning mouth syndrome (BMS), third molar extractions or temporomandibular disorders (TMD). A search in PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsycINFO on 8 June 2017, updated 14 January 2019, combined with a hand search identified 2104 articles. After screening of abstracts, 1607 articles were reviewed in full text and 36 articles were included that reported OHIP data for 44 patient populations including 5849 patients. Typical Orofacial Pain impact for all four conditions (odontogenic pain, oral mucosal pain/BMS, pain after third molar extractions and TMD) was between 2 and 3 on a 0‐8 converted OHIP scale with the highest reported impact for pain after 3rd molar extractions. This review provides standardised information about OHRQoL impact from four oro‐facial pain conditions as a model for the Orofacial Pain dimension. The results show moderate impact for the pain dimension of OHRQoL in patients with common oro‐facial pain conditions.

show abstract

Evaluation of the life quality in patients with Temporomandibular Disorders

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Impact of oral diseases on oral health-related quality of life: A systematic review of studies conducted in Latin America and the Caribbean

Impact of oral diseases on oral health-related quality of life: A systematic review of studies conducted in Latin America and the Caribbean

Photomodulation in the treatment of chronic pain in patients with temporomandibular disorder: protocol for cost-effectiveness analysis

The impact of oro‐facial pain conditions on oral health‐related quality of life: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About