Evaluation of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Different Biomass Feedstock Electricity Generation Systems

Abstract

This paper evaluates life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the use of different biomass feedstock categories (agriculture residues, dedicated energy crops, forestry, industry, parks and gardens, wastes) independently on biomass-only (biomass as a standalone fuel) and cofiring (biomass used in combination with coal) electricity generation systems. The statistical evaluation of the life cycle GHG emissions (expressed in grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per kilowatt hour, gCO 2 e/kWh) for biomass electricity generation systems was based on the review of 19 life cycle assessment studies (representing 66 biomass cases). The mean life cycle GHG emissions resulting from the use of agriculture residues (N = 4), dedicated energy crops (N = 19), forestry (N = 6), industry (N = 4), and wastes (N = 2) in biomass-only electricity generation systems are 291.25 gCO 2 e/kWh, 208.41 gCO 2 e/kWh, 43 gCO 2 e/kWh, 45.93 gCO 2 e/kWh, and 1731.36 gCO 2 e/kWh, respectively. The mean life cycle GHG emissions for cofiring electricity generation systems using agriculture residues (N = 10), dedicated energy crops (N = 9), forestry (N = 9), industry (N = 2), and parks and gardens (N = 1) are 1039.92 gCO 2 e/kWh, 1001.38 gCO 2 e/kWh, 961.45 gCO 2 e/kWh, 926.1 gCO 2 e/kWh, and 1065.92 gCO 2 e/kWh, respectively. Forestry and industry (avoiding the impacts of biomass production and emissions from waste management) contribute the least amount of GHGs, irrespective of the biomass electricity generation system.

Carbon Footprint of Electricity Generation in Brazil: An Analysis of the 2016–2026 Period

“…Results suggest that the main impacts were related to eutrophication, destruction of the ozone layer and toxicity categories [14]. Kadiyala, Kommalapati and Huque [19] evaluated life cycle GHG emissions from the use of different biomass feedstock categories include electric power generation. The study by Berrill et al [15] used a modeling framework integrated with hybrid LCA to examine 44 different scenarios for the supply of electricity in Europe in the year 2050.…”

Strategies of Coping with Deactivation of NH3-SCR Catalysts Due to Biomass Firing

“…Similar trends are seen in other regions of the world [2,3]. Replacing fossil fuels, especially coal, by biomass aims at reducing the CO 2 emissions associated with thermal power plants [2,[4][5][6][7]. Even though renewable energy sources like solar and wind power are more and more cost competitive [8] and make up an increasing share of power generation in most regions [9], some thermal power plant capacity is still needed due to the renewables' fluctuating nature and the current lack of sufficient storage capacity [10].…”

Not carbon neutral: Assessing the net emissions impact of residues burned for bioenergy

“…The model includes HPT emissions for forestry residues and other wood as equivalent to 4% of the carbon content of green chips, based on Domke et al (2012) and reviews of other studies [9,29]. The model assumes the alternative fate for agricultural residues is decomposition, as crop burning occurs on less than 1% of agricultural acres in the US [30].…”