“…Similarly a 105-fold decrease in k 0 15 (p, p), if apportioned equally between E and A, would lead to 10 9.1 exp(À13,900/RT) s À1 , compared with the initially assigned value of 10 10.1 exp(À11,500/RT). In this case, there is even less basis for a firm assignment [46] but the change again seems large. Least palatable is the requirement that these changes be specifically coupled such that the k b (p, p)/ k 15 (p, p) ratio would be increased by !10 4 in going from PIB to PaMS.…”